User talk:Superastig


 * Welcome to my talk page. Take note of these rules before posting a comment.
 * If you're here to report disruptive edits from IP users and the pages involved, take them to the WP:AIV and WP:RFPP where they're better taken care of. I'm not an admin.
 * If you're here to make a big deal out of certain Filipino-English translations, get out. Translation does not mean direct word-for-word conversion into English by machine. A little common sense is required.
 * I welcome good and laid back conversations, but I don't tolerate arguments. I have the right to end and delete any conversation which evolve into arguments and therefore are not worth continuing.
 * For those who are not using visual editor for replying, always sign your comments with four tildes.

Nomination of Talakayan Ng Bayan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talakayan Ng Bayan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Talakayan Ng Bayan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Lenticel ( talk ) 05:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KKGU


The article KKGU has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No sources, fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 15:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KKGU for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KKGU is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/KKGU until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. AusLondonder (talk) 19:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KMOP


The article KMOP has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Lacking secondary sources, fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 19:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

"DZHH-AM" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=DZHH-AM&redirect=no DZHH-AM] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Greetings
Hello I'm Matthew the user who helps editing articles i noticed you added a episode title in the header called "Episodes" or "List of episodes of X" nice job. have fun editing. Matthew24kyle (talk) 16:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of David Lyme


A tag has been placed on David Lyme, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ZyphorianNexus (talk) 15:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

What is the real branding for DXKR 95.5 FM Davao? Retro Davao or Retro 95.5?
As I've listened to their station on DXKR-FM, they aired two brandings namely Retro Davao and Retro 95.5. Why do you revert my edits on that article? I heard that 95.5 in Davao both mentioned Retro Davao and Retro 95.5 on their station IDs. What is the real main branding for this station? CryingSulfur (talk) 06:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Retro 95.5 is what the station usually carries. I've been to Davao a few times before. So, I should know. And Retro Davao is just used for location purposes since there's Retro Cebu. One brand is only needed for most parts of the article and that is Retro 95.5. ASTIG 😎🙃 10:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Whos the real owner of DWPM?
Who is the real owner of DWPM, baycomms or PCMC? Is the list of NTC updated? 120.29.79.79 (talk) 11:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Go to the FOI and ask. There's no other way. ASTIG 😎🙃 14:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Is this source trusted? https://philippines.mom-gmr.org/en/media/detail/outlet/dwpm-radyo-630-3/ it says under the license of baycomms 120.29.79.79 (talk) 03:05, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Secret. 🙃 Just leave those pages as is. You have no choice. ASTIG 😎🙃 05:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)