User talk:Supereagle1963

Please refrain from removing sourced material, it's considered vandalism. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 15:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm Thewikiguru1. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Tunde Banjoko without thoroughly explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Thewikiguru1 (talk) 01:16, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Tunde Banjoko, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:24, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

This is Supereagle1963, my real name is Tunde Banjoko. I have no idea who set up a Wikipedia page in my name, but I should at least be able to edit it. I do not know how to use Wikipedia properly and have tried to edited some inaccuracies that came up against my name. I don't know how I can be blocked for editing information about myself and the charity I founded. The charity is no longer called Local Employment Access Projects, we have legally changed the name to Making The Leap. We no longer make reference to the US organisation STRIVE, that stopped over 10 years ago. We are no longer an employment charity, we are now a youth and social mobility charity. The over-zealousness of the moderation on Wikipedia, is in this case allowing inaccurate information on the internet. I have been blocked for 'vandalism'? That is absurd. Who do I need to contact and how do I contact them so that this blocking is removed? I'm furious!!

Tunde Banjoko OBE Supereagle1963Supereagle1963 (talk) 11:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I have put the sourced information about LEAP in the past tense. I have also created a new section called 'Making the Leap'.  If you have any references then they would be appreciated.  Unknown Unknowns (talk) 12:00, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

We have closed down for Christmas, but there will be an news article on the website soon, quoting me. I will post a link here when it's up. I am still blocked from editing. I have only ever tried to edit my own information and so it's ridiculous. I don't really know how to use this site, but I am extremely offended that I am blocked. It's so heavy handed, it's unreal. You are allowing out-of-date, inaccurate and personal information out there and when the rightful owner, edits it, in preparation for putting accurate info there, I get blocked. Ridiculous!! I have a number of times donated to keep Wikipedia free, I will not donate again! Superagle1963Supereagle1963 (talk) 17:13, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Help me please!!!! I do not understand what is going on. I have just found out that I have been accused of vanadalasim for changing inaccurate information on a page about me. I don't know how to use this properly. I want the page about me, Tunde Banjoko deleted. I am just an ordinary person. Why should my month and year of birth be displayed to the world. Please help me somebody. Supereagle1963Supereagle1963 (talk) 17:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I have unblocked this account since the issue here is legitimate WP:BLP concerns gone awry, not vandalism, but I'd ask you not to remove content from the article about you that is based on reliable published sources such as the Guardian (that will be considered disruptive). You are welcome to point out any problems with the article's content on its talk page or to contribute to the deletion discussion, of course. However, being the subject of the article does not give you a greater say in that article's fate than any other editor, and arguments in the deletion discussion not based on Wikipedia's policies (particularly WP:BIO and WP:Verifiability) will not be given great weight. Huon (talk) 03:10, 18 October 2015 (UTC)