User talk:Supergamer345

License tagging for File:Slime Time Live.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Slime Time Live.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Your recent edit to the page All of the Lights appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.  STATic  message me!  17:14, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * The inclusion of only Rihanna as a featured artist on the single is cited in the article; there are atleast two sources in the article that confirm it for the single. As discussed at the talk page, the article is about a single. Please do not change it. Dan56 (talk) 20:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Album (The Firm album) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. If you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. -- Dan56 (talk) 20:52, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Hey there.I saw your summary that I needed to fix the sample.
I saw your revert because of the sample that has mistakes.I"ll reupload it again to make it better.-- Damirgraffiti  ☺Say Yo to Me!☺   21:08, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Fixed the sample.
Hey there.Thank you for telling me to fix the sample.I have fixed and placed it back in the article.I hope you don't mind.-- Damirgraffiti  ☺Say Yo to Me!☺   20:30, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nate-dogg.jpg


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 21:29, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nate-dogg.jpg


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 21:48, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nate-dogg.jpg


A tag has been placed on Nate-dogg.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Phil ip.t.day  talk  21:53, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent uploads, such as the file you uploaded at Nate-dogg.jpg, did not appear to be constructive and has been or soon will be deleted. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Repeated uploading of a copyrighted image. (This has been third time reported on User Page).'' Phil ip.t.day   talk  21:55, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Nate-dogg.jpg. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  ttonyb (talk) 21:57, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Nate-dogg.jpg, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  ttonyb (talk) 21:57, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Nate-dogg.jpg, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not remove Deletion Tags repeatedly! Phil ip.t.day   talk  21:58, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nate-dogg.jpg


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 21:58, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Reported to administrators
I have chosen to notify you that I have reported you to the administrators, for you repeated and wanton removal of Speedy Deletion templates from Nate-dogg.jpg. Please refrain from removing these templates, regardless of what (if any) action the administrator may choose to take. Phil ip.t.day  talk  22:06, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Just to let you know, I have deleted this page now and on this occasion have decided not to block you. You posted on the articles talk page that it shouldn't be deleted because it contributed to an article, however there was no image that I could see so I don't see how it would contribute to an article?  It was deleted as a test page because that was exactly what it appeared like.  Please note that if an article you create is placed for speedy deletion you must never remove the speedy deletion template from articles you create.  If an article is marked for speedy deletion it will be viewed by us admins who will then decide whether or not it has a place in the encyclopedia.  If it does, we will remove the speedy deletion template and allow it to stay, if it doesn't we will delete it.  Any questions feel free to ask me on my talk page.--5 albert square (talk) 22:22, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nate-dogg.jpg


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 02:23, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Advice on uploading images
Hello!

Thanks for uploading some pictures to Wikipedia. I wanted to make sure you were aware of some of the requirements and good practices for uploaded images.


 * Pick an image name.
 * When uploading an image, pick a file name that is descriptive, and unique. Remember that many images may be uploaded about the same topic, and remember that names are case sensitive.


 * Source the image.
 * On the image description page, explain where the image came from. If you created the image yourself, then say so.  If it's from the web, give a URL.  If it's a screenshot of a movie or game, or a scan from a book, give the title.


 * Provide copyright and license information.
 * This part is a little bit trickier, but it's very important. The copyright of the image generally belongs to whoever created it.
 * If it's a photograph you took, or an image you created (modifying an image that already exists doesn't count) in software like Photoshop or GIMP, then you hold the copyright. To upload it to Wikipedia, you must agree to license it under the GFDL (which allows anyone to use it, but requires that they give credit to the original author and requires that any further edit to the image be licensed under the GFDL as well) or release it into the public domain (which allows anyone to use it for any purpose without restriction.)  Do this by placing an appropriate tag on the image description page, like  or .  Be sure to mention that you created the image.  If you're using, you may also want to use , since there is some dispute as to whether one may grant items into the public domain.
 * If you didn't create the image, or the copyright somehow belongs to another party (like a screenshot, which you might "create", but the copyright belongs to the author of the movie or video game), then you need to find another tag that describes the copyright status of the image. Images used on Wikipedia need to be free for our use and the use of sites which reproduce our content.  This means that images cannot have a restriction such as "only for use by Wikipedia", or "for non-commercial use only", or "for educational use".  Images without a free license may be usable in certain articles under our policy for non-free content, but such a use must be justified on the image description page.


 * Describe the image.
 * To another reader, the image may not be immediately understood. A caption in an article doesn't explain the image to a visitor who sees it on its image page.  Put a brief explanation of what is in the image on the image description page, similar to what you might include in a caption on an article.

Some links to Wikipedia pages on this subject:

Copyrights, Copyright tags, Non-free content, Image description page, Public domain, Images for deletion, Possibly unfree images, Copyright problems, Uploading images

Thanks again for your contributions. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at my talk page.--5 albert square (talk) 05:31, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:56, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nate-dogg.jpg
Hello, Supergamer345! When uploading images(files) to Wikipedia make sure you leave the File: prefix on the title. Doing this will place the file in the correct namespace, so it will not be deleted immediately. Thanks, Sumsum2010 · T · C  17:59, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Sumsum2010 · T · C 18:17, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nate dogg picture.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nate dogg picture.jpg. Contrary to your tagging of the image being in the Public Domain, there is no visible evidence that supports that claim.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Striker force Talk Review me! 22:39, 18 April 2011 (UTC)


 * In fact, the web address supplied from an earlier creation of this perennially deleted and re-added image showed clearly a copyright on the page. As a quick review of this talk page will show, this image has had some... history with administrators over recent hours (or is it days yet?). Phil ip.t.day   talk  22:44, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I thought that it might be the same image and, in fact, placed a warning for repeatedly uploading the same image, but after second thought, I didn't know for certain that it was the same image, so I reverted myself. If it's the same image, feel free to re-add the warning. Striker force Talk  Review me! 22:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It is the same. It is linked to in the image description. I'll let you add the tag to avoid an edit conflict. Phil ip.t.day   talk  23:22, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop uploading the same copyrighted image repeatedly without obtaining permission to use it and providing the appropriate fair use rationale. Striker force Talk  Review me! 23:48, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Nate dogg picture.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Nate dogg picture.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 02:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nate dogg picture.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Nate dogg picture.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 03:20, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nate Dogg.jpg


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 03:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

I have reluctantly blocked you from editing for a period of 24 hours. I say "reluctantly", because you are clearly enthusiastic, and much of your disruptive editing appears to be more a question of not understanding than of any ill-wish. However, you really must stop making inappropriate file uploads. You have been advised about this numerous times, but still persist. In addition, you have continued to remove speedy deletion tags from files you have uploaded. At first this may have been done through ignorance, but you have continued after being informed that it was unacceptable, and by then you knew what you were doing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions, but please make sure you do not continue in the same way, or you will be blocked for a longer period. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Unblocking Request

 * Comment. I'd like to let the Admin know that we've heard this user claim that he'll stop, and take advice once before. Phil ip.t.day   talk  18:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * So you'll unblock me early.--Supergamer345 (talk) 18:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not an administrator, so I do not have the right to determine the length of your block. I am simply informing the administrator that does review your request, that you have said you'll 'behave' before, and then immediately failed to do so.
 * Honestly mate? I wouldn't hold my breath for an early un-block, but it's not for me to say either way. We'll soon find out! Phil ip.t.day   talk  18:51, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 3-Way (The Golden Rule). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 13:23, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 3-Way (The Golden Rule). Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''There is no confirmation that the said release is a single, so please stop continuously reverting it. There is an open discussion in the talk page and participate in it'' — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 13:24, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to 3-Way (The Golden Rule). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ۞  Tb hotch  ™  &  (ↄ),  Problems with my English?  01:04, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

There is discussion about this at WP:ANI.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 01:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:We&#39;ll Kill U cover.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:We&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:12, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:We'll Kill U cover.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:We'll Kill U cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. Please note that we take very seriously our criteria on non-free image uploads and users who repeatedly upload or misuse non-free images may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. ΔT The only constant 18:17, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Snoop Dogg Sweat remix cover.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Snoop Dogg Sweat remix cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:05, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Obie Trice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bilal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Snoop Dogg Wet cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Snoop Dogg Wet cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)