User talk:Supergirlracing

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Badgernet   Talk  11:16, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion of Brands GP
A tag has been placed on Brands GP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. manadude2 (talk) 21:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Redirects
Please, STOP creating pages that tell the user to see another wikipedia page.

Wikipedia has a markup for creating redirects, which you should use.

The way you are doing it at present means that somebody is having to go round after you cleaning up the mess.

Mayalld (talk) 21:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Please note that the reason I created new pages was because Wikipedia led me to create them when I linked on them. I've not worked out how to create different links to the same content, yet. I'm going to go and read your colleague's suggested text to see if I can figure out how. Please be patient.

Speedy deletion of MiniTwins
A tag has been placed on MiniTwins, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Mayalld (talk) 21:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Apologies for phrasing, but this is not advertising - nothing is gained financially by Tim or Mike over this series. I am merely trying to indicate the ways that SV650s are used in UK. I appreciate the two link pages and thank you for 'tidying up my mess'. However, your phrasing comes across very abruptly. I realise that you have a lot of these to deal with - please consider a slighlty softer phrasing and cut and paste it each time you wish to 'reprimand' people - otherwise it just sounds like youre trigger happy. Please advise on how you wish me to display my non-profit non-advertising and purely fact installing content.


 * It isn't a matter of whether anybody makes money. The question is whether the page exists primarily to increase the profile of the subject.


 * As to the "tone" of the advisory message, it is considered important to ensure that the authors of articles proposed for speedy deletion should have consistent and proper information, and to that end, the message that you received is a standard message that is sent, rather than a message that I created.


 * The key question is whether the subject of the article even meets our notability guidelines If not, then no article can be created. Mayalld (talk) 21:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Is that better, please?


 * Is what better? I don't see that you have changed anything. Mayalld (talk) 21:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't like your tone. It's agressive and arrogant. I will come back to this when I want to. Delete it if you feel you need to. In the meantime, the stubs will remain and nobody will know what they are when they link on them.


 * You said "is that better, please?", which implies that you have, in some way, improved the article, such that it is no longer blatant advertising. So, I take the time to take a second look at the article, and find that it hasn't changed. In the spirit of trying to be helpful, rather than just processing things, I ask what you have changed, in case you've created a copy elsewhere that you want me to offer a view on.
 * You can indeed come back to things whenever you want, but please don't waste my time by asking if it is better now when you haven't changed it.
 * If the articles are deleted, any incoming links will also be removed.
 * I've tried to be reasonable here, but it is clear that these articles as they stand don't meet the standards for inclusion, and that rather than accept that, you wish to shoot the messenger.
 * You complained when you got a bog standard message, you don't like my tone when I deviate from standard messages. It would seem that I would do better to communicate in standard messages from here on in. Mayalld (talk) 22:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

FYI conflict of interest guideline
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. — Athaenara ✉  02:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)