User talk:Supermann/Archives/2019/August

A case request in which you had been involved has been declined
Dear ,

On behalf of the arbitration committee, I would like to inform you that the case request named "topic-banning Supermann from all pages related to film for one year" (in which you had been listed as involved party) has been declined. The committee concluded that has no jurisdiction on the issues involved in this case, and that therefore cannot be accepted.

Sincerely, Kostas20142 (talk) 16:21, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Editing restriction lifted
You were under an editing restriction, imposed by me with (if I remember correctly) your consent, around topic areas concerning Bliss Media. This restriction is now lifted. Note that you did not explicitly ask for this restriction to be lifted, and note that you have indicated you may be under a movie topic ban imposed in August 2017; I believe that was imposed by the community rather than me, and would still be in effect. Again, I'm not trying to trap you here. That community ban is still in effect and is larger than the one I imposed. If you are at all unsure, please ask! Looking into recovering the three articles in the next few minutes. I explicitly state that your request to recover those three articles is not in violation of your community-imposed ban. --Yamla (talk) 13:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Bliss Media is back. S.M.A.R.T. Chase was already there. What was the third article you wished to be considered for undeletion (again, with my explicit note that you are free to answer that question and this will not be considered a violation of your topic ban). --Yamla (talk) 14:02, 6 January 2018 (UTC)