User talk:Supermann/Archives/2023/August

Indefinite block
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. Specifically, WP:BATTLEGROUND conduct (at times testing the boundaries of WP:NPA, if not exceeding it outright) and WP:BLUDGEON to excess. Supermann, there appears to be a failure on your part to see these problems addressed, despite multiple attempts by others urging you do so. I think at this point, you need to provide substantive and convincing assurances that this misconduct will be corrected, if you are to be unblocked (a reminder that reviewing WP:GAB closely will aid in such an effort). If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 11:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Dude, nobody goes on about "inclusionists" or "deletionists" unless they've got a battleground attitude. The rest of us are just trying to make the encyclopedia better and don't want to get dragged into drama. You can probably bet that people who go on about this kind of thing (picking sides and going on about it at length) are going to start getting blocked a lot more often. I've been on Wikipedia for 14 years now. The first few years were pretty intermittent, and I gave up on Wikipedia multiple times. Even so, that's almost ten years of solid editing, and four years that I've been a CheckUser. Let me tell you, it gets incredibly tiring. The last thing you want to hear is something like "I totally don't have a battleground attitude! This other group that I intensely dislike is the real problem!  They're ruining Wikipedia, and I'm just battling – I mean fixing – their disruption." I can't even bear to finish reading your unblock request. Right around the point where it turns into some kind of rant about deletionists, I tune out no matter how many times I try to read it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * +1. Beyond that, I'm raising an eyebrow at the complaint about his efforts being "underappreciated." Supermann, there are thousands of productive editors who never get a barnstar, never get a kudo, just plug along with their wikignoming without seeking or expecting their egos to be stroked.  I've had multiple months where I've bettered your "15 years" worth of modest editing totals, and that's nothing, because there are high flyers who do far more than I ever could, each and every month of each and every year, and they not only don't expect their egos to be stroked themselves, but they do their work without provoking constant drama. This is a good block.   Ravenswing      08:50, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

All right criticism! Hearing from experienced editors who have their creations in the past also deleted is refreshing. That’s a great learning experience. Thank you so much for sharing. I finished King Richard on HBOMAX last night. The guy also has a lot of ego problems. I don’t want to be him. I just want to keep my head down and have no drama in my life. While I had thought clarifying my thinking process would only add more context, I now understand people are just fed up with it. I don’t have a lot of desires to create pages anymore. If I can have the ability to just thank others, that is good enough for me, as I don’t have money to donate. Have a good weekend. Supermann (talk) 13:20, 20 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Wish you a good luck on your real-life journey. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 04:38, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

U2 Supermann (talk) 14:59, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kingdom of Dust poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kingdom of Dust poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:14, 28 November 2021 (UTC)