User talk:Supermoose15

September 2023
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Cullen328 (talk) 19:23, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Please read conflict of interest and paid editing(paid editing includes internship and employment) and tell what will be different about your editing going forward. Please also confirm that you will be the only operator of this account- others at your organization will need their own accounts. 331dot (talk) 21:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I'll make this account a personal account (already changed the email) and will use it for contributions across wikipedia and not solely to update the organization page. That way I'll be the sole operator of this account and anyone else at the organization who feels the need to make edits on wikipedia will have to make their own.
 * Editing going forward will not be limited to the organization page but also on pages where more information can be added to supplement information already existing. Secondamendmentfoundation (talk) 21:47, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * You may use whatever email address is easier for you- no one knows it other than you(unless you reply to email sent via Wikipedia) or whether it is "business" or "personal". I think you are close to unblocking, but please describe your understanding of WP:COI in terms of how you will make such edits. 331dot (talk) 00:35, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Based on my reading of the article, I'd have to disclose a conflict of interest as it relates to edits related to the organization and I'd be barred from making mass changes to the article (eg. the band manager example of not writing the band's page). There are three ways to do so and I'd likely opt for disclosure in the edit summary rather than the profile.
 * On other areas of wikipedia, there may be conflicts that could arise, depending on whether the organization was involved in a matter (eg. editing a page about a particular lawsuit that the organization was a part of).
 * As to the edits themselves, they would have to be neutral in nature and not in a manner that seeks to raise the profile or push a certain narrative that would be for the benefit of the organization. By way of example, the edits I previously I believe absolutely fit within this confine (updating the number of board members, removing a "key person" who no longer holds that role, adding a new "key person", wanting to update the outdated logo to the new logo, etc.).
 * Had I made, or should I attempt to make, edits that attempted to increase the importance of the organization's activities, or involvement in a particular matter, those would certainly be a conflict and not for the betterment of the encyclopedia. Secondamendmentfoundation (talk) 13:27, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Would you agree to use the edit request process in most cases? (exceptions are listed here) 331dot (talk) 08:39, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I reviewed the edit request process. Yes, I would agree to use that. Secondamendmentfoundation (talk) 17:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, I was wondering if you had any outstanding concerns here. Thanks in advance. 331dot (talk) 19:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I do not. Thank you. Secondamendmentfoundation (talk) 20:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * , I have no objections to unblocking as long as the editor uses formal edit requests for all edits directly related to the Second Amendment. Cullen328 (talk) 20:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I was addressing Cullen328. 331dot (talk) 20:46, 18 September 2023 (UTC)