User talk:Superp/Archive 1

Kees van Dongen
WP:BRD does not an edit war make! That was from whatever source I was using at the time (in the days before inline citations were mandatory). It's more important what it was then, than what it is now. How about "then on the outskirts"?  Ty  01:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Done.  Ty  12:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of AIESEC MUMBAI
A tag has been placed on AIESEC MUMBAI requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; e. ripley\talk 03:00, 2 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I speedied AIESEC Mumbai too and both were deleted. Superp (talk) 11:26, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Aha! Looks like you got caught in this one.  (I hadn't seen the history, only saw the new page created most recently).  Looks like they've all been taken care of though.  Take care &mdash; e. ripley\talk 13:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

The Illusionist (2010 film)
Hi Superp, I have suggested a NPOV re-write on The Illusionist (2010 film) here. The same could go for Tati. Onwards and upwards! Best wishes Spanglej (talk) 23:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Wonderful, thanks. talk:The Illusionist (2010 film)
 * Superp (talk) 16:09, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I've deleted the awful sentence and cited 9 sources. We'll see how it runs. The film comes out on tomorrow (Friday) in the UK... lots of profile there, then... Best wishes Spanglej (talk)


 * Thanks Spanglej, and well done. Cheers. Superp (talk) 06:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC)


 * It's good working with you. Thanks for bringing your experienced hand to the discussion. Rest well. Best wishes Spanglej (talk) 06:44, 19 August 2010 (UTC)


 * That's mutual. You know, I find this one quite a challenge, especially with the limitations of the medium, because of the pain that is obviously there. I am constantly trying to balance WP quality with that guys sensitivities and my own desire to enjoy being here. You should see the edits and comments I did not save. I really sympathise with him, as I wrote I really learned a lot from the discussion. But I see it coming to a point where he is blocked and walks away with more hurt than he brought here in the first place. That would be sad. Having said that, the sun is shining here and walking away from the keyboard is always an option. Cheers. Superp (talk) 13:28, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Have you had much to do with 'socks'? Not sure of the best way to deal with them. Seems very involved. I find it all tiring too. Not sure I could do a lot of it. It touches on painful subjects, for sure. Don't take it on. Hope the sun is still shining. You're doing great. Best wishes Spanglej (talk) 00:52, 20 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Can't say I have. Do you think this article was puppeted? I occasionally do a bit of edit filter log patrolling, but I mostly just edit. There are so many people taking care of things, 24/7...when you take on a job, it reduces the workload per ant, and it stigmergically communicates. But it mostly would get done anyway. Enjoy the weekend. Superp (talk) 14:39, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes you're right, I ought to do edit summaries really. It's just that I do a lot of edits and when it's a very very minor edit like that one, I tend to skip it as I'm lazy lol. Anyway I'll make sure I don't in future. Feudonym (talk) 05:03, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi Superp,, just wondering if your tag of factual inaccuracy on the film still applies. I lost track of the reverts. I think things are pretty straight... best wishes Spanglej (talk) 03:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

re: Le p'tit Parigot
Hello - and thank you for creating the article in the first place. So many missing French/silent films on here! Speaking of silence, I based the category on the fact it's a 1926 film and the first sound film was The Jazz Singer from 1927. Hope that helps. Any further questions, please ask or head to the talk page of the film project.  Lugnuts  (talk) 07:34, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Villa Arpel
This was a temporary construct for a Tati exhibition in Paris last year at the Cent Quatre. Hektor (talk) 10:36, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Juan Solari
Just letting you know that this PROD that you placed was contested on my talk page this afternoon, incase you wish to peruse deletion through AFD. Courcelles 17:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't assume I have any opinion in the matter. When it comes down to it, restoring PROD's on request is very much a robotic process.  Read the article, make sure there's no BLP problems, make sure it wasn't suitable as a speedy, and then restore it.  The admin's opinion on whether it would survive AFD never enters the equation, as that gives us too much control over the process. Courcelles 16:57, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Cognitive Style
No problem. Thanks for your interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael J. Mullany (talk • contribs) 21:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)