User talk:Supplements

User talk:Supplements/Archive 1 User talk:Supplements/Archive 2

Not that you haven't heard before...
Hey, I'm sure you've heard this before, but you may want to give up on the whole gastric bypass thing. Keeping it in your userpage is probably a good idea, or you can put it in a subpage. If you want advice, I'd say edit a little more and get the feel of what kind of stuff goes in articles, especially regarding neutrality, original research, and focusing on encyclopedic content rather than sort of instruction manuals. I did some of the same thing; I did irreparable damage to Dynasty Warriors, so much that I couldn't even go in and clean it out once I was more experienced. Once you get more experienced, you could try re-writing the article fromm an informative viewpoint rather than an instruction guide. Once you have a little more experience, writing an article will be much easier. Everyone learns at their own pace, but I've been editing for about 6 months under this name (and about 6 months before that anonymously) and I've still never written one. Just give it some time and try again later. Karwynn (talk) 16:14, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Possible spam?
Hi, I just wanted to inform you of Wikipedia's spam policy. You may notice in the edit history of your user page, DragonflySixtyseven removed a good bit of content from your user page, including your desire to sell supplements on Wikipedia and the gastrc bypass diet information. While doing so without first dropping you a note was probably not the best idea, he's right that that sort of content is considered promotional spam. I recommend you also remove this material, since asking people to contact you at customer support is considered spamming as well. If you don't, it will likely be removed by someone else. YOu are welcome to discuss the gastric bypass diet on your user page as long as you do so in a way that makes it clear that it is your opinion rather than fact and refrain from promoting certain products and brandnames. Let me know if you have any questions. Karwynn (talk) 16:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I know exactly what you mean, it took me awhile to really get used to Wikipedia ongoings myself, I too got carried away sometimes. Thanks for removing the content, and don't worry that this is oging to reflect poorly on you and everything.  Keep this guideline in mind; everyone makes mistakes, so don't let it deter you from editing assertively in the future.  Happy editing!  Karwynn (talk) 18:51, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Optproch.jpg listed for deletion
I have nominated for deletion as spam. You may want to comment on its entry at images for deletion. Thanks, Karwynn (talk) 16:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Phew
I'm glad to see that you're not upset about my trimming your userpage; I would have left a note, but I was very busy dealing with a sudden wave of Colbert-related vandalism.

I'm pleased to see that you're a genuine, productive contributor, and I hope you enjoy your participation in the project. DS 04:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Weight training exercises
I have reduced the size of the images, which has reduced the page weight from over 1 MB to under 500 kB. This should take just over a minute to download on a full-speed 56kb dialup connection, which I think is quite acceptable. However it may take longer for you if your line quality is poor. GeorgeStepan e k\talk 07:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I have reviewed the changes and you did a great job thanks.--Supplements 13:42, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Cdl.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cdl.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:05, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

oos
Motor vehicle declared out of service was deleted because it was a very badly written article. It looked like a quick copy and paste of the regulations. Now try again and start with the context - what country/state are we talking about! -- RHaworth 02:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Cdl.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cdl.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Liftarn 13:50, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:02171.jpg
You claim this image has "no rights reserved" but the site you got it from is clearly labeled "all rights reserved". If you have any "proof" to back your claim please provide it as described on Requesting copyright permission, otherwise I'm afraid we have to delete it (a fair use claim might also be a possibility). --Sherool (talk) 16:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC) Image:02171.jpg
 * I own the site the image is being pulled from. This image is as I stated a free use image.--Supplements 19:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Driver.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Driver.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi, well it would probably be better to make a "release" page on each of the various sites themselves. A bit more convincing than having freeimages.verticalag.com claim out of the blue that contet from for example www.bubbajunk.com can be used freely. At the very least you should make it a lot clearer what the relationship between all those sites are, and who actualy hold the copyright, otherwise it kinda looks like freeimages.verticalag.com is simply "stealing" the images. --Sherool (talk) 18:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Well you would not need to release the whole site naturaly, you could make a page on the relevant domain that spesify that these and only these images are free use, while the rest of the site and it's content is fully copyright protected or something like that. It might also be an idea to drop an e-mail to "permissions AT wikimedia DOT org" with a list of images from your sites that may be used freely along with whatever information you think is nessesary to identify you as the owner (it's intended to record permission obtained from 3. parties, but this kind of situation might fit too since people can find the images on copyrihted web-pages). Also the more relevant info you put on the image page here the better (how was the image originaly obtained etc) to asure there are no misunderstandings down the road. --Sherool (talk) 18:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Optimum Nutrition Inc.
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Optimum Nutrition Inc.. Your test worked, and has been or will soon be removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please see WP:CORP and WP:SPAM. NawlinWiki 16:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Ian King
Can you take a look at the article on Ian King. Currently it seems that subject lack notability big time. Aditya Kabir 15:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello!
Hello! Do you know what, if anything, is happening with the WikiProject Bodybuilding project? I have been unable to contact Glen (either on Wikipedia or via e-mail), and many of the people who are listed as participants are no longer on Wikipedia. Is there any way to jumpstart this WikiProject? Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 17:31, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. -- Herby talk thyme 12:19, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Image author problem with File:Sleepingswan-Before-after.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sleepingswan-Before-after.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Anome (talk) 15:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Peplau2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Peplau2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Surgicaltech.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Surgicaltech.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:41, 12 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calvin 1998 (t·c) 02:41, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Patient-care-technician.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Patient-care-technician.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:41, 18 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:41, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Truck driver and friend, in front of a blue tractor-trailer cab (c. 2006).jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Truck driver and friend, in front of a blue tractor-trailer cab (c. 2006).jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cdl1.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Cdl1.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:45, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Dehydrated. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dehydrated.. Since you had some involvement with the Dehydrated. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 06:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:SmallASTlogo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:SmallASTlogo.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SmallASTlogo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:SmallASTlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 03:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

"High protein" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect High protein and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 05:21, 1 February 2022 (UTC)