User talk:SurbhiAV

Speedy deletion nomination of Kailash agarwal
Hello SurbhiAV,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kailash agarwal for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Terlob (talk) 08:40, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

SurbhiAV (talk) 05:15, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Dear Terlob, I have been trying to upload a content page about Kailash Agarwal but it has been deleted can you pls help me with the guidance regarding the sameSurbhiAV (talk) 05:15, 1 October 2013 (UTC).

Technical 13 (talk) 19:03, 5 October 2013 (UTC)


 * There were a couple of issues with the page. Most importantly, much of the content you added was copied from his corporate website - that's a copyright violation. Furthermore, the draft didn't cite any reliable sources that were independent of the subject. We need such sources both to establish that the subject is notable enough for an encyclopedia article and to allow our readers to verify the content. Finally, the article's content was unduly promotional. We're not here to sing Mr. Agarwal's praise. Huon (talk) 19:42, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:SurbhiAV


A tag has been placed on User:SurbhiAV, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion
The reason why your page Kailash Agarwal was deleted is that it was written to promote him, but Wikipedia requires a neutral point of view. You wrote things like "a distinguished leader at the height of his career... Avighna’s multiple impeccable creations... a diverse range of premium properties... Each creation is a testament of Avighna’s guiding principle of keeping function over form and quality over quantity... " etc. That was not an encyclopedia article, that was a blatant advertisement, a puff-piece, written in PR-speak and full of "peacock terms". Anything like that is deleted from Wikipedia at sight, and for that reason I have nominated your user page User:SurbhiAV for deletion as well.

Although we do not explain it well to new users, Wikipedia is not a place for people or organizations to tell the world about themselves, and is very resistant to being used in that way. From your edits and your username, I presume that you work for Avighna. In that case, you should read Conflict of interest and the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.

Those guidelines will tell you that you should not post articles directly but may prepare drafts for consideration. If you do that, you should first read Your first article in more detail, and then write in a completely different tone - no opinions, no glowing adjectives, only plain facts, neutrally stated and cited to reliable sources. Do not copy from existing websites, because (a) that would be a copyright violation unless a formal copyright release is made, and (b) they are likely to be unacceptably promotional in tone. If what you write gives any appearance of trying to "sell" its subject, it will not be accepted. JohnCD (talk) 19:48, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Avighna India Ltd


A tag has been placed on Avighna India Ltd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 11:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)