User talk:Sure Templeton

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Juliet Simms has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.create&editor=True. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Disruptive Editing RE: Juliet Simms
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Syd Highwind (talk) 17:18, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

For the record, your writing on Juliet Simms is quite bad. You probably should be using the talk page and getting consensus for your edits before adding them. They are full of peacock terms, promotionalism, and the style of prose is the antithesis of what we want in an encyclopedia. We don't use flowery terms, we don't use Instagram as a source. I suggest you read WP:RS to learn what is and isn't a reliable source, use the talk page more, and dial back on the adjectives and attempts at puffing up the subject of the article. Continuing to edit in this fashion is considered disruptive. I don't know for sure, but I'm getting the feeling you are associated with Juliet, by either being paid to edit or know them. You aren't doing any favors if all your edits get reverted and you end up getting blocked from editing. I would also note that your edit summaries are often quite rude, and sometimes are casting aspersions; this isn't something we tolerate. Again, you need to dial it back or you will find yourself blocked. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 01:25, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Automatic Loveletter 2009.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Automatic Loveletter 2009.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 02:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)