User talk:SurfRiderMAX

January 2024
Hello, I'm Thesixthstaff. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Haroon Akhtar Khan seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''The corruption charge section is well-referenced and your other additions to the article do not adhere to WP:NPOV. If you think that section should be removed, bring it up on the talk page.'' Thesixthstaff (talk) 18:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your comments. Agreed on your point about ensuring Wiki has a neutral point of view. I removed these because the corruption allegation was not about Haroon Akhtar Khan. If you read both referenced articles in full, this is clear. I still believe they should be removed from this page. SurfRiderMAX (talk) 18:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It also looks like you removed the other changes I made which are duly referenced. Any reason you did that? SurfRiderMAX (talk) 18:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 *   Could you please assist with this? I don't think my changes should be reversed and they have now been repeatedly reversed. SurfRiderMAX (talk) 06:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi! If you look at the edit history, I have only reverted your edits once, unless you were that IP address that blanked the corruption section the other day, in which case I have reverted twice. While you did add citations for some of your additions, parts still didn’t adhere to WP:NPOV, notably “After moving back to Pakistan, Khan and his brothers built a successful industrial business group that has controlling interests in sugar, ethanol, carbon dioxide, beverages, textile and fintech.”
 * In tandem with removing the corruption charge section and other distinctly positive word choice, as well as the characterization of the referenced corruption allegation section as “libelous” in the edit summary, it gave the overall impression of a PR edit, which led me to revert. The revert function rolls back all parts of a particular edit simultaneously. You are still free to edit the encyclopedia; if you edit the page again and keep all of your edits compliant with guidelines and WP:MOS they shouldn’t be reverted. This also probably is not relevant to you, but I want to let you know that Wikipedia does have guidelines about potential conflicts of interest that might be worth a read. Thanks! Thesixthstaff (talk) 12:54, 25 January 2024 (UTC)