User talk:Surf the imidazole

Regarding Pharmacological evaluation of ethanolic extract of flowers of Tagetes erecta on epilepsy
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. erc talk/contribs 05:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Pharmacological evaluation of ethanolic extract of flowers of Tagetes erecta on epilepsy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. erc talk/contribs 05:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I am afraid I have deleted the article, for the second time. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original research, and even if your article were appropriate for Wikipedia, you can't put just a part of it (i.e. the abstract) to Wikipedia, and ask those interested in it to e-mail you for the rest. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! France 3470   ( talk ) 02:47, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

GCC Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of GCC Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://ejpli.at.ua/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:32, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

June 2015
Hello, I'm Stesmo. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of List of open access journals. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 21:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm EchidnaLives. I noticed that in this edit to Kantara (film), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. echidnaLives (talk) 09:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kantara (film). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 01:22, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kantara (film), you may be blocked from editing. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 01:26, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kantara (film). Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 01:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)