User talk:Surface wall

Inappropriate and indiscriminate article tagging
Hi Im andd i've noticed that some of your usages of templates might be inappropriate. I recommend that you read the sourcing guidelines and look over the template to see when the template should be used. if you don't start following these guidelines other Editors and I will undo your edits. thank you.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 14:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Surface wall, I have just undone your addition of the refimprove tag to Didone abbandonata (Albinoni) and Philip N. Diehl. Both these articles had multiple inline citations to reliable sources. Your tagging of the latter article was particularly egregious. If you think something in an article needs an additional citation, discuss it on the talk page rather than tag-bombing the article. I have gone through several of the many you have been tagging today and will revert your additions. What made you chose all those articles to tag? Did you just click on "Random article" and then add the tag to whatever came up? Please follow Jeffrd10's advice above and stop this kind of tagging. Voceditenore (talk) 15:07, 13 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Will you please stop this indiscriminate tagging. You don't even seem to be reading the articles. Why did you tag Borat, a Featured article with multiple citations? You have continued with this disruptive editing after two editors have spoken to you about it with an explanation as to why it is inappropriate and you are doing so at a rate of one tag every 15 seconds.. Will you please stop and respond here, now. Voceditenore (talk) 15:35, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 16:01, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ''Please stop adding 'refimprove' tags to articles that do not need it. This is considered disruptive and will result in a block. '' --Regards, MrScorch6200 (talk · contribs)  15:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Regards, MrScorch6200 (talk · contribs)  15:43, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. m.o.p 16:46, 13 February 2014 (UTC)