User talk:Surrendertotheinfinite

September 2022
Hello. it's great to see new editors coming on board to improve our articles! I have been editing Nahid Angha lately, and you have undone all my work of several hours, including the fact that her brother sued her (per the legal documents in the references). Unfortunately, your explanations in the edit summaries you left were insufficient for anyone to understand your reasoning.

Given that I was attempting to make the article, per the templates, more WP:ENCYCLOPEDIC, less promotional and more about the individual rather than the conflict, I am led to question your motives here. Would you be so kind as to explain why my edits were not constructive to this online encyclopedia? Thanks; I look forward to discussing this with you soon.--Quisqualis (talk) 16:56, 3 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi... Thank you for reaching out. I do appreciate all the time that you put into the page. I noted the changes you made. An editor previous to you decided to drastically change the content of the page rather than just improve it. I wanted to get back to the previous material so that it could be improved. Make sense? As it turns out, I wasn't able to complete the task before more editors decided to hop on. I hope you can better understand my changes now, and again thank you for your time and relevant changes. Surrendertotheinfinite (talk) 22:40, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * That is far from an adequate explanation, and not nearly honest. Again, I question your motives. I will reinstate my edits if you don't respond adequately by 10PM PDT. PS: Have you any connection with the article's subject?--Quisqualis (talk) 02:09, 6 September 2022 (UTC)