User talk:Surtese

Reconsider?
We'll always need editors who understand the importance of a good source, and the field of archaeology is under-repersented. Please reconsider. Nev1 (talk) 19:37, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't see why you think this is a problem. Wikipedians do disagree, usually about trivial points like plebs. I was trained as a classicist, from literary sources, but we could use an archaeological view on the early history of Rome very badly. I was taught that the Kings were incompatible with the archaeological evidence; if that is still true, then almost all of our early Roman history needs to say so. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 15:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC)