User talk:Surveyresearchman

Nomination of Michael Grubb (artist) for deletion
The article Michael Grubb (artist) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michael Grubb (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Grutness...wha?  07:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Michael Grubb (artist) page for deletion
I know this is my first article but I really hoped to write one on this person. Did I do a bad job? Pleasehelp! This person is a renowned artist and has won many awards including a international award out of 30,000 artists and is now becoming famous. I think I'm a bad writter? can anyone  help to improve this?
 * The problem's not with your writing, it's with the notability of the subject of the article. You claim that Michael Grubb is a renowned artist and has won heaps of awards, but there's no evidence other than things written by Michael himself. There needs to be independent verification, and it's very difficult to find any which supports these claims. Notability (people) lists some of the usual requirements for a person to be considered notable enough for an article, and Verifiability and Identifying reliable sources explain about what sort of references need to be shown. If you can provide verifiable independent references for the article, then do so, and please comment about it at the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Michael Grubb (artist). Grutness...wha?  22:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC)