User talk:Surya167

I am afraid that Wikipedia is not a free advertising platform, and that includes user pages

It is full of unsourced spammy claims, and for that matter most of the content has no sources. Some examples follow. I've bolded obvious unsourced spam. Note that the company website is not an indeependent verifiable source
 * Intelenet Global Services is a leading  global Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) company led by the Intelenet management team, backed by Blackstone, a leading Global Private Equity Player.
 * Intelenet delivers Contact Centre, Finance & Accounting (F&A), and Transaction Processing services to Fortune 500 companies representing the Financial Services, Retail, Insurance, Telecom, and Manufacturing, Healthcare and Travel & Hospitality industries in the UK, USA, AUSTRALIA and India. evidence?
 * ''Several leading telecom, banking and insurance companies rely on Sparsh to manage their key business processes
 *  Blackstone has been a leader in the field of private equity investing since 1987 with investments in over 100 companies and a superb record in financing companies. evidence
 * the list of people's CVs is unencyclopaedic and spammy
 * He has been involved in setting up several profitable group companies evidence
 * Chandramouli played a significant role in the implementation of operations, business processes and product development.evidence? . Mouli is a health freak and a keen cricketer. He does a lot of research on native and epic writers and their unpublished literary work. why is this relevant
 * he ensures optimum productivity. 
 *  Barclays was acquired as one of our major clients. also needs evidence
 *  vast knowledge of and experience in
 * '' Our value proposition goes beyond just cost savings and quality; we deliver strategic impact through increased productivity and continuous process improvements.  We offer services across retail banking, business banking and shared services.
 * Intelenet combines the best of people, processes, technologies, and operating models to provide high-value and high-quality solution to our clients.

You have an obvious conflict of interest, and have produced a largely unsourced, clearly promotional article.

If you want to write this, make sure that all the information is neutral and has in-line references so it can be checked jimfbleak (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Surya167


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Surya167, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
 * It is a rejected submission at Articles for creation, and it has not been edited in over a year. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. j⚛e deckertalk 19:07, 1 June 2013 (UTC)