User talk:Suryathapa

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kishor Panthi, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 21:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Kishor Panthi. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Kishor Panthi. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Kishor Panthi. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 31 hour common vandalism block. Do not WP:EDIT WAR to include inappropriate links within articles. Continued disruption will result in longer or indefinite blocks. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:42, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Isn't this just another sock account? See Sockpuppet_investigations/Nileshnilesh/Archive. Hairhorn (talk) 22:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Repost of Kishor Panthi
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hang on underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 02:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC)