User talk:SusanFrankford

May 2023
Hello, I'm Bruce1ee. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Insurance have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. —Bruce1eetalk 22:22, 26 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Bruce1ee, the article you cited seems to out of date so I updated it with a new source. Also the article I cited appears to cite notable works and does not seem to commercial in nature. SusanFrankford (talk) 19:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The website's "About" page (https://insuranceranked.com/about) suggests that it is commercial in nature:
 * "'InsuranceRanked's goal is to highlight the top brands innovating in insurance. We strive to develop comprehensive and well-researched content to help consumers compare and learn more about their insurance coverage options.'"
 * Adding links from this website creates the impression that you are promoting it. See WP:EXTPROMO. —Bruce1eetalk 23:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Got it. So even if the article is not commercial in nature, if the entire site is commercial is in nature then it's no good as a source? @Bruce1ee SusanFrankford (talk) 03:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Are you in any way affiliated to insuranceranked.com? Spammers will often add weblinks to Wikipedia articles to increase traffic to their website. —Bruce1eetalk 07:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I am not affiliated with insuranceranked.com.
 * Just for future reference, from your point of view, if the article is not commercial in nature and if the entire site is commercial is in nature then you would not consider it a good source? SusanFrankford (talk) 10:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)