User talk:SusanLesch/Recent talk

Deletions: Go ahead and delete any of my uploads. I would prefer no deletion tags on my talk page please. If I happen to sign on during a discussion I will try to contribute. Rules and fads come and go. Licenses are harder to change.

Orphaned non-free image File:Lovin' Spoonful-Nice-1966.ogg
 Thanks for uploading File:Lovin' Spoonful-Nice-1966.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Dear Stefan2, I restored this to the article. An IP removed it today, perhaps accidentally. Thank you for the incredibly quick catch. -SusanLesch (talk) 04:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I restored it again just now. It's within fair use guidelines as far as I know. Thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 04:23, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

IdeaLab proposal
There is a proposal at the IdeaLab that may interest you. Lightbreather (talk) 20:33, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Test Kaffeeklatsch area for women-only
Since WikiProject Women as proposed at the IdeaLab may take some time to realize, and based on a discussion on the proposal's talk page, I have started a test Kaffeeklatsch area for women only (cisgender or trans-woman, regardless of sexual orientation).

It is a place where women can go and be sure they'll be able to participate in discussions without being dominated by men's advice, criticism, and explanations. If interested, your participation would be most welcome. Lightbreather (talk) 23:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

John Lewis
Thank you for pointing out the LA Times op-ed piece. I've added a block quote to the controversy section of Selma}. Perhaps you can and additional material, or help set up the quote better. I'd felt badly about the tide of what I considered irrelevant (from mainly self-serving Johnson COIs) criticism, but was hoping for something the quality and gravitas of Lewis' piece. (Surely the passage of 49 years in public service ought to give a (or the) primary source the currency of secondary. — [[User:Neonorange|Neonorange (talk) 23:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * You're welcome but I must say we read his letter much differently. (It takes all kinds. :) I would prefer to keep this discussion on the article talk page. Thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 04:50, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Selma
The issue of the controversy was not about what was omitted, but what some historians claim was a deliberate distortion of President Johnson's attitude and role. Few would quibble with the right of DuVernay to not want to make another "white-savior" film and instead put an emphasis on the perspective of her primary subject matter, or her right to leave out mention of many prominent individuals across the social and racial spectrum who participated in the Selma marches or otherwise supported King. What Updegrove, Califano and other historians take issue with is how Johnson, who spearheaded the drive to pass the Civil Rights legislation and who proactively engaged and supported King, is portrayed as either a reluctant or obstructionist actor or self-interested opportunist. So your inclusion of Lewis' reference to the Lincoln film doesn't fit here.--Civlaction (talk) 06:53, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, Civlaction. The discussion belongs on the article talk page, not here please. I see you have already posted there. Thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:14, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Second Sex-20100831.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Second Sex-20100831.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

ITN
Too bad the man died broke.
 * — All too human.
 * "Heard the song of a poet who died in the gutter." – Bob
 * Sca (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Invitation

 * Hi Susan. If you're around, we could use experienced Wikipedians like yourself at this event. gobonobo  + c 09:12, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Alice H. Lichtenstein
Hello! Your submission of Alice H. Lichtenstein at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Alice H. Lichtenstein
The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

ITN credit
Good work. ThaddeusB (talk) 03:38, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Precious
  the road to character

Thank you, Susan, for quality articles on women through history such as Lisa del Giocondo, Jeannette Piccard, Sharon Sayles Belton and Alice H. Lichtenstein, for improvements such as Denkoroku, for portal Minnesota, a simple clear user page and The Road to Character, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (16 October 2010)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:03, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Good heavens. Gerda Arendt you are so kind. Thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)


 * A year ago, you were recipient no. 1192 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:25, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 13 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * On the William Hood Dunwoody page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=680864131 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F680864131%7CWilliam Hood Dunwoody%5D%5D Ask for help])

DYK for William Hood Dunwoody
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Lake Calhoun naming issue
Hello SusanLesch,

For multiple reasons, I think you are very much mistaken to suggest that it is more encyclopedic to include both the legal name and the Dakota name when linking to Lake Calhoun.

First and foremost, the common practice on Wikipedia where place names have both European and Native names is to discuss the dispute on the actual place name's page itself, and perhaps use both names on that page, but not on linking pages. Examples abound, including Denali/Mt. McKinley, Mount Rainier/Tahoma, and Mount Baker/Kulshan. In each of these instances, linking pages almost solely (if not solely) use one name or the other, but not both. For example, despite active suggestions that Mt. Rainier should be officially renamed "Tahoma," no pages linking to the Mount Rainier page use the phrase "Mount Rainier, Tahoma" in the relevant wikilink.

Second, Wikipedia policy is to avoid political advocacy: see WP:ADVOCACY. In this case, the question of what the proper name of Lake Calhoun should be is very much a contentious political issue, and using a name that is not the legal name of the lake on linking pages subtly lends Wikipedia's authority to the concept that both names have (or should have) official status. Whether the Dakota name should replace the legal name is up to personal opinion, and Wikipedia should not (intentionally or otherwise) lend credence to that viewpoint.

Finally, listing the lake's name on linking pages as "Lake Calhoun, Bde Maka Ska" is quite confusing, especially when the name often appears on linking pages as part of a list of lakes. When someone without knowledge of Minneapolis reads a sentence containing the words, "Lake Harriet, Lake Calhoun, Bde Maka Ska, and Lake of the Isles," most people would naturally conclude that there are four lakes being referenced, rather than three. That level of uncertainty defeats the clarity that an encyclopedia strives for.

For these reasons, I intend to change the Minneapolis page back to read simply "Lake Calhoun." However, I thought I would be polite and notify you of my reasons first, and await any thoughts you might have. If you still disagree with that move, please feel free to respond here or on the Minneapolis page itself, where we can have a group discussion, rather than relying on one person's opinion. Thanks! Jrt989 (talk) 22:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Greetings, Jrt989. Why don't you copy this to the Minneapolis talk page, where this discussion might belong? I already posted to the Lake Calhoun talk page where you might also wish to contribute. Thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 22:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates National Book Award inadvertent deletion
I believe you inadvertently deleted a support for your nomination in | this edit. User:Rhodesisland just supported your nomination and you deleted it accidently? Brian Everlasting (talk) 02:06, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Restored. Thanks very much for telling me. If something else can go wrong today it will. I'll post a note to Rhodeisland's talk page. -SusanLesch (talk) 04:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for getting it back! See you around the 'pedia! Rhodesisland (talk) 21:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Invite to an edit-a-thon at the Loft Literary Center

 * We have also recently formed a user group for Minnesota editors. If you would like to join, please add your name to our page on meta. Thank you, gobonobo  + c 23:51, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 09:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Minneapolis
Thank you for your recent help in the Culture>Music section of Minneapolis. 23.240.220.74 (talk) 00:24, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Replied on your talk page. -SusanLesch (talk) 03:23, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Invite to Wiki Loves Pride MN!

 * We have also recently formed a user group for Minnesota editors. If you would like to join, please add your name to our page on meta. Thank you, RachelWex Talk c 21:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Linking cities, states
It's great to see another MN fan... but please read up on our manual of style for linking cities in the USA: Rklawton (talk) 14:48, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Greetings Rklawton. The MoS isn't applicable here. They are trying to name places. We are trying to point to them. Why obscure both Minneapolis and Minnesota with a wikilink to Minneapolis, Minnesota? -SusanLesch (talk) 18:41, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Question posted at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names). No need to carry on here, thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 19:32, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

So basically you saw in the MoS that I was right but you decided to revert anyway? That's a bit WP:OWNish don't you think? Rklawton (talk) 19:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * No. Conversation is over here. You're welcome to argue at the above link. -SusanLesch (talk) 20:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You are citing a talk page with exactly one opinion supporting your view and using it as justification for your 2nd revert. That's not how we build consensus here on Wikipedia. Rklawton (talk) 20:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

World Wide Web raised at WP:ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Inventor(s) of the World Wide Web?. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:33, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elmer McCollum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phosphorous. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Elmer McCollum
Hello! Your submission of Elmer McCollum at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! FunkyCanute (talk) 20:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

San Diego Wiknic
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for San Diego-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Elmer McCollum
Greetings, Susan Lesch. You may have noticed that I just promoted Elmer McCollum to the DYK prep area. While I judged it good enough to pass DYK, I would strongly recommend that you either thoroughly copy-edit it yourself, or submit it at WP:GOCE. While the prose is fine, the section divisions feel like arbitrary breaks; the prose often picks up from the previous paragraph with no explanation of the new topic. Otherwise, well done with the article. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 12:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Elmer McCollum
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Thursday, August 4 San Diego Wiki-Dinner
Join us for an informal San Diego Wiki-Dinner meeting with visiting Wikipedians and, to get to know each other, and to help prepare for WikiConference North America in October 2016! --Pharos (talk) 17:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Computer Security user status
Hello SusanLesch,

I would just like to inquire on your status on WikiProject Computer Security as the list of WikiProject Computer Security/Members is going to be improved to list active and inactive users.

This is update is being done according to a request for comments on the WikiProject Computer Security talk page. Be sure to state your status at the User status section in the WikiProject Computer Security talk page before the end of four weeks as this will state your status as inactive in the project if not done before then.

FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 19:30, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Henri Laborit
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

WikiLink to Orpheus and Faid
Hi SusanLesch, I added Salman Rushdie's comment on Bob Dylan's Nobel prize to the Dylan article: “From Orpheus to Faiz, song & poetry have been closely linked. Dylan is the brilliant inheritor of the bardic tradition." I linked Faiz and Orpheus since I thought they were not familiar terms in an article on popular music. (Personally, I had not heard of Faiz until this mention.) I was surprised you removed the links, and would like to restore them. Best, Mick gold (talk) 14:19, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Mick gold, go ahead and restore the links if you wish. WP:LINKSTYLE says to not link inside quotations which is why I removed them. Thank you for your great work on this article, and on maintenance during such a busy time. -SusanLesch (talk) 16:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comments :) Mick gold (talk) 22:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MinneapolisEthnicity
Template:MinneapolisEthnicity has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MinneapolisPopulation
Template:MinneapolisPopulation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MinnesotaCountySeats
Template:MinnesotaCountySeats has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:45, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Meetup
Hello. Here's an event happening soon. Might you be able to make it? Jonathunder (talk) 14:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the invitation, Jonathunder. Sorry I will be out of town. Seems like a great place to hold a meetup. Please wave at the William Hood Dunwoody gifts if you think of it. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:11, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

2017 Women's March
Hi,

I provided a compromise approach on the talk page discussion about the three times statement.

I think that there are a couple of things that are happening:
 * Confusing 3x statements about the comparison between the 2009 Obama and 2017 Trump inaugurations, like your statement that Washington Post said that the Women's March was 3 x the size of the Trump inauguration. They didn't say that, that I've been able to find anyway, but they did say that Obama's first inauguration was likely about 3 x the size of the Trump inauguration.
 * That the 500,000 is likely a low estimate of the crowd size for the Women's March, based upon the photos (which is original research without sources). But, unfortunately, it seems to be routinely reported that there were about 500,000 people at the march. Many of the articles that explain the difficulty in calculating the attendance figures state why it's difficult to give an accurate estimate.
 * There's a wide disparity between the estimates for the size of the march Trump's inauguration from 200,000 to 600,000 - or up to 1.5 million if you're Trump.

Readers of the compromise paragraph could decide for themselves if the Women's March was 2 1/2 times, 2 times or about the same as the Trump inauguration... and look at the images from the NYT article and decide for themselves.— CaroleHenson &thinsp; (talk) 22:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * correction— CaroleHenson &thinsp; (talk) 23:10, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * User:CaroleHenson, again I am sorry for the error! You are right that I misread The Washington Post. Thank you for the correction. I have replied on the article talk page. -SusanLesch (talk) 01:53, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

St. Cloud, April 15, 2017: Wikipedia as Social Activism
Please come and join if you can!

Shaded0 (talk) 22:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Precious two years!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:32, 24 April 2017 (UTC) ... and three ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:27, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

L'Étoile du Nord?
R U a Minnesotan? Me too, though I've been gone for many years. Nice to work with you on the Rouhani ITN brouhaha. Sca (talk) 00:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I grew up in Minneapolis. Moved away years ago but am a big Lynx fan. Go Lynx! -SusanLesch (talk) 02:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Mn61.svg
 * And I'm a big Dylan fan ... most of the time. Sca (talk) 13:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Love Mr. Dylan. What happened to that song in the Google songlist? -SusanLesch (talk) 13:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * No clue. A while back I added some of his lyrics to the Iron Range article. Sca (talk) 14:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * PS: A couple alternate performances of one of my favorites: . – Sca (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Gad, he can be depressing. I started an article about one of his drummers Howard Wyeth, who plays on this one. He was dead at 51. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:31, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * P.S. To which you contributed some quotation marks, I just noticed. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

I know about Howie Wyeth. Tragic story. I agree that his drumming on Desire was "ethereal," especially on Black Diamond Bay – a spooky song anyhow. Sca (talk) 21:43, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Notability of Dosho Port
I have created an article about a living Zen master, Dosho Port. It was reviewed and rejected by Seraphim System because the sources were deemed be inadequate. A subsequent review by worldbruce went into more depth and also considered the sources inadequate. (His review has been deleted.)

My problem is that within the world of contemporary American Zen, Dosho Port, is famous and respected. He has studied and practiced Zen for 40 years. He has studied with several of the most prominent Zen masters of the 20th century. He has taught at several Zen centers and is now the head abbot of the Nebraska Zen Center, one of the oldest Zen centers in the U.S. He is published. So within the world of Zen, Dosho Port is notable.

How to demonstrate this? The sources I cited in the article would be considered authoritative within the world of contemporary American Zen. In other contexts they might be considered inadequate, but that would be applying the wrong context.

Do you have any suggestions of how I can move forward?

Thanks, TooTallSid (talk) 17:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, TooTallSid. Sorry, not really. I guess you'd need to find him given in a third party reliable source. I just looked and did not find him in Zen Master Who? by James Ishmael Ford. Lots of people have practiced for 40 years and remain outside Wikipedia. It might take years. (For example who ran the Nebraska Zen Center for the last 25 years?) Good luck. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:24, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Woops, hold on, he is in there. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * (Incidentally you answered my question: it was Nonin/Norman Chowaney.) You can quote page 135 which lists the dharma heirs of Katagiri. It says "Dosho Port guides the Wild Fox Zen Monastery outside the twin cities[sic]." I doubt there is any question that his heirs are notable. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:56, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Edits on Minneapolis page: what are you talking about?
You reverted my edits to the Minneapolis page. Why did you do that? Why on Earth would you accuse me of vandalism? If you cannot provide some constructive criticism, please do not revert my edits.

Trump administration
Lots of open 'white space' around "Notable non-Cabinet positions"
 * Could you possibly tighten that up to look more compact and align the columns in "Notable non-Cabinet positions"? MaynardClark (talk) 14:52, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at Minneapolis. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. You appear to be edit warring in order to keep images in the article, of which you are the photographer. Please take a moment to read MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE. This article is not your personal photo gallery. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest
Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

Granite Mountain Hotshots
I saw the link you created in Prescott Fire Department. From the edit summary, I wasn't sure if you were aware that there is additional coverage, including their names, in Yarnell Hill fire. MB 16:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, MB. No I did not know that, however, it still seems a little odd to me that they don't have their own article. -SusanLesch (talk) 23:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Minnesota Lynx
I saw that you removed the comment in the lead about Glen Taylor also owning the Timberwolves stating "Undid because that is not who he is". I am not sure what you mean as he is the majority owner of both teams. Noting that a WNBA team is under the same ownership as an NBA team is consistent across all articles as most people have noted that is how the WNBA survives. See New York Liberty, Washington Mystics, San Antonio Stars, and Indiana Fever as examples. Even teams not owned by NBA teams are noted as not being affiliated in the lead (Atlanta Dream, Chicago Sky, etc.) and the Los Angeles Sparks even have a note that they used to be owned by the Lakers ownership. It would seem logical that the ownership (Taylor) should be noted as being involved with both. Yosemiter (talk) 02:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Greetings, . This does not belong here. If you must, kindly start your discussion on the talk page of the article to which you are responding or the WikiProject Basketball talk page. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I was only explaining why I reverted you and was asking you to explain why you feel it should be removed. In my experience here, minor league talk pages rarely get any feedback, it seemed like you had issue with the inclusion of the mention of the Timberwolves, so I felt I should contact you directly for your direct thoughts on the matter. I simply asking for a more thorough answer as your revert explanation was confusing to me. Thank you, Yosemiter (talk) 15:40, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * , Mr. Taylor is a lot of things (he owns a business, two basketball teams, and a newspaper, and is a former state senator). I continue to resist Wikipedia's non-reciprocal treatment of the NBA and WNBA. As far as I'm concerned the article should stay the way it is until the day people start making sense with respect to women's sports. I liked your rationale with illustrations of the Liberty, Mystics, Stars and Fever (and Sky and Dream) so thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 19:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your edits on Ayn Rand Institute
Hi, SusanLecsch. Thank you for your edits on the Ayn Rand Institute article. I appreciate you updating that information; however, with due respect, I feel that your edit summaries there violate WP:GOODFAITH. Please do not continue to make edits implying that whoever made the edit had ulterior motives when making the edit. It's quite obvious that the information is simply outdated. I do appreciate you updating the information, but I do not appreciate your cynical edit summaries. Michipedian (talk) 23:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Minion
Hi, thanks for your edit. I don't think your source was aware that the Minion family includes an "optical size" for display use that's specifically intended to look crisp at large sizes, fixing the problem he mentioned. Maybe he didn't have access to it. It looks like this. Blythwood (talk) 21:55, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Marjorie Husted
Gatoclass (talk) 01:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Grand Rounds-Chain of Lakes-Minneapolis-map.jpg


The file File:Grand Rounds-Chain of Lakes-Minneapolis-map.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 17:32, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to a bonfire
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Meetup/San Diego/April 2018. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:38, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Press coverage 2018
And I thought adding three articles on the gun-thing was a lot... :P Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Portals
Hi Susan. As I recall the Minnesota Portal is your work (and very good work at that). There's a proposal afoot to eliminate all portals: Village_pump_(proposals). Feel free to comment there. Best wishes, Kablammo (talk) 17:55, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Solved: File permission problem with File:INRIA 2007-02-05.jpg
Thank you very much for sending an ORTS ticket -- the backlog displayed in the template (269 days!) shocked me. I have sent one myself, 10 days ago. So it's just 259 to go until my file gets approved. lol ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:12, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thank you for taking the time to send an ORTS request.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC) 

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Garry Winogrand-crop.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:13, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join Women in Red

 * Thanks, Susan, for adding your name to our mailing list. We look forward to more articles about women.--Ipigott (talk) 07:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thanks for taking photos of the latest additions to the Minnesota Lynx!

Czycha (talk) 20:53, 8 June 2018 (UTC) 
 * Aw, so sweet. Thank you, Czycha. -SusanLesch (talk) 21:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)