User talk:SusanWrightAZ

Welcome!
Hello, SusanWrightAZ, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Explicit prior permission, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Chaotıċ Enby  (t · c) 21:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Explicit prior permission


A tag has been placed on Explicit prior permission requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.kpact.x y z/2023/05/22/rough-sex-defense-consent-and-law/ and uclawreview.org/2023/05/03/consenting-to-change-the-new-sexual-assault-provisions-of-the-model-penal-code. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chaotıċ Enby  (t · c) 21:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I've removed the two citations of the law review article that you state is a copyright infringement. None of the rest of this article was drawn from that law review article. It was pulled from original sources such as the ALI or case law or research articles. SusanWrightAZ (talk) 22:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It's not enough for you to release your copyright to us, as you claimed you were doing on the article talk page, since the organisation currently claims copyright and reserves all rights. If you, and not they, own the copyright, you must get them to remove their claim and replace it with a PD or CC BY-SA 4.0 licence Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:59, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * My article is now shared under Creative Commons license on the websites where it's been posted. I'll make a note of that in the next version of EPP under Talk, so it won't be as confusing. Thank you. SusanWrightAZ (talk) 19:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)