User talk:Susanbryce/resources

"The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societys state that there are more than 1.5 million street children all over the Philippines and most are just poor and beg for money, or sell flowers or candy on the street, this whole thing about ending up in slavery is mostly made up by me since I have no life. .http://www.ifrc.org/docs/news/03/03102401/"

The IFRC is not the only people to accuse you of making things up. Many people have. Your online petition is the most outrageous pack of lies ever put out by an NGO operative. And why would the IFRC accuse you of making things up? Because when someone lies as blatantly as you do, you harm the cause of those genuinely trying to help.80.111.155.138 (talk) 17:25, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

The following has been deleted before: I have raised this issue before, and note that rather an explanation being given, someone has seen fit to delete the comment: So I will raise the question again: How can Wikipedia engage Miss Bryce as an editor, when it is clear that there are serious questions about her integrity especially in her NGO role. I assume that it may well have been Miss Bryce herself who deleted the comment. If so he seems eager elsewhere to explain herself, but not in this case.

For those of you who need to form an opinion, please take a look at petitionline44441212. If you believe the figures put forward by Miss Bryce in this petition, it extrapolates to every female in Angeles, regardless of age, being raped or murdered five times annually. That is not the only glaring untruth, but it gives a flavour of what is either Miss Brice's extreme imagination or downright dishonesty.

Wikipedia's credibility is based on the integrity of it's contributors and editors. Miss Bryce has contributed several articles on Child Sex Trafficking in SEA, but in my opinion, not only does she compromise the integrity of Wikipedia, but also that of the NGO's that are attempting to protect these children. It does not help them to garner funds if it is shown that that there are people like Miss Bryce, who are not just exaggerating the figures, but twisting them exponentially. Miss Bryce's activities can be compared to the recent furore regarding the University of East Anglia viv-s-vis climate change figures being allegedly manipulated. It helps those whose best interests are served by being able to deny the scale of the problem, except in this case, her exposure will serve the paedophiles for whom Miss Bryce is apparently opposed to.80.111.155.138 (talk) 22:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)