User talk:Susanwalkermagicmusic

Hi,

I moved Sara Levy to your userspace at User:Susanwalkermagicmusic/Sara Levy as you blanked the page and it mow only contains "under construction". Blank pages are not permissable in Wikipedia mainspace. If you finish the final version, you can re-add it at a later time. Travelbird (talk) 11:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alan Wainstein


A tag has been placed on Alan Wainstein requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zachlipton (talk) 04:23, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Zachlipton (talk) 04:24, 13 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Susan. Further to the above, a general rule of thumb is that you should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability - all edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability. If the achievements etc. of your company and the people associated with it are verifiable and genuinely notable (See WP:ORG for the company and WP:BIO for the people) and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone uninvolved will probably create an article about them sooner or later. Kind regards, nancy  12:13, 13 February 2011 (UTC)