User talk:Sussexhumanitieslab

So wikipedia hasn't changed much. I spend 40 minutes updating a page about a new major £3 million investment in the area of digital humanities analogous to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Digital_Humanities,_King%27s_College_London and some random person deletes my work and offers redirect. Because wikipedia. How about doing some basic research into how big the scale of that investment is, or how it is comparable to other research centres in the same area which you already have entries on.... To be honest guys, delete it if you like. I don't know why I bothered. Sussexhumanitieslab (talk) 13:09, 28 June 2015 (UTC) talk:Sussexhumanitieslab

June 2015
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Sussex Humanities Lab. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. ''Calling me a moron when I'm trying to help is a personal attack. Add it to the existing University of Sussex page, it's not notable in its own right.'' Joseph2302 (talk) 13:19, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Sussex Humanities Lab shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:19, 28 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Would you like Sussex Humanities Lab moved to Draft space, so you can work on it with a greatly reduced risk of summary deletion? —C.Fred (talk) 13:21, 28 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I think you need to lay off new users with the over-eager deletion policy. By all means make new people drafters, and make their articles draft subject to review, but this speed of clean-up and removal is a serious disincentive to add anything. And completely a waste of my time. As regards your internal weird language policing, I really am not interested, the issue is the speed of deletion. I won't be back. I have more important things to write that aren't immediately deleted on other web platforms and magazines. Sussexhumanitieslab (talk) 13:32, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  14:16, 28 June 2015 (UTC)