User talk:Sussie Quatro

Welcome
Hello,. I am SimsFan and I am here to say Welcome to Wikipedia. As a new editor, I think you may be interested in the following pages: And if you have questions: Also, if you have any questions about Wikipedia, then just leave a message on my talk page. Just click new section or + and type your message. Then sign it with 4 tidles ( ~ ).
 * About Wikipedia,
 * An Introduction to Wikipedia,
 * Wikipedia's Manual of Style,
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia.
 * Wikipedia's Help Desk

Once again, Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. SimsFan Talk to Me • Commons 17:48, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Flagging Silvester Home Run for further review
Hello, … I recently encountered the article about Silvester Home Run and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I am considering tagging  for deletion according to the Deletion policy … I do not have time to examine the article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that Some Other Editors (including at least one administrator) may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. —triwbe (talk) 14:27, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Flagging Sebastian Bieniek for further review
Hello, … I recently encountered the article about Sebastian Bieniek and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I am considering tagging  for deletion according to the Deletion policy … I do not have time to examine the article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that Some Other Editors (including at least one administrator) may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. — triwbe (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sebastian Bieniek
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sebastian Bieniek, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. triwbe (talk) 23:00, 21 July 2008 (UTC)