User talk:Sustainabilityandresilience

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, SuezSmartSolution. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 00:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Dear MrOllie, I appreciate your constructive feedback. I have learned so much since I started contributing to Wikipedia. However, none of the five highlighted concerns apply to my recent contribution. SuezSmartSolution (talk) 23:52, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Dear MrOllie, your comment is appreciated as my recent contribution (you referred to the tenth revision) was quickly reverted. I look forward to hearing from you and making a correction. Please provide a specific reason than a general. Your help is much appreciated. SuezSmartSolution (talk) 23:37, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Your writing is largely unsourced, and is full of low-meaning buzzwords. You're adding stuff that sounds more like a corporate brochure than an encyclopedia. MrOllie (talk) 23:40, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback. There are two main words, 1) service-oriented and 2) Industry 4.0, which are both Wikipedia sourced and well recognized than low-meaning buzzwords. I will try a new version and probably will ask experts in this field for contributions. Also, I will contact Michael Grieves for further clarification. Again, thanks for your help! SuezSmartSolution (talk) 23:52, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Rather than bringing in more people who have conflicts of interest (and the fact that you brought them in alone may be considered a conflict), I would suggest that you spend some time familiarizing yourself with Wikipedia by editing topics that are unrelated to yourself, you company, or your professional interests. Get a feel for the preferred style and the manner of citation, which can be quite different from corporate communication or academic publishing. MrOllie (talk) 23:59, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure, I thought a contributor needed to be professional in a field. This is a great idea. I take your recommendation. Thank you! SuezSmartSolution (talk) 00:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Personalization, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 23:40, 5 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the prompt feedback. This page needs a big update, including structure, references, and content. In particular, Ref [14] shows on the 404 page.
 * https://www.answers.com/personalization&r=67
 * I have tried to add a positive impact with some helpful content and highly recognized references, which all reverted. 114.31.213.184 (talk) 23:50, 5 September 2022 (UTC)