User talk:SusunW/Archive 14

DYK for Catherine Feuillet
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hermine Speier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Etruscan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Lidija Liepiņa
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

An award for you

 * Thank you . It is always a pleasure to work with you. SusunW (talk) 16:45, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for May Owen
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Catherine of Palma
I wonder why you removed catimprove? Accident, or some reason I can't fathom? Birth and death cats aren't enough - she needs nationality, saint, kind of saint, etc. Needs expansion too, of course: I'll try and add a bit more from the sources. Pam D  07:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * When I left it, it had birth, death, Spain, saint. If the basics (DOB, DOD, living, nationality, occupation) are covered, cats can always be added. We have found, and discussed it several times on the project talk page, that tags are almost like asking for an AfD nomination. But if you want to flag it, certainly do that. It's WP, anyone can edit. My intent is never to cause grief, but prevent it. SusunW (talk) 07:55, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, I've been through this misunderstanding loop myself, removing the tag and being told why it should stay. Stub categories "Don't count". When you left it had birth and death as "real" categories", and a stub tag which put it into "Saint stubs" and "Spanish religious biography stubs". If the article expands and the stub tag gets removed ... it falls out of any categories other than the birth and death date ones. It needs to have proper categories, or a tag asking for them. So an article can be "Uncategorised" even if it has a stub tag putting it into stub categories, or "Catimprove" ditto. I don't normally do much about adding categories - subject experts tend to know their way around the systems in their own areas, I specialise more in stub tagging, and I'm often editing on my mobile where categories are inaccessible. But I've found her a few good detailed categories now.
 * You say "Tags are almost like asking for an AfD nomination"? If something's the matter with an article, fix it. If the tag is inappropriate, remove it (there are some power-crazy idiots doing New Page Patrol). But please don't remove tags just because you don't like seeing them on an article and are worried it might go to AfD.  Pam  D  08:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. As I said, I think you will find my intent is always to help. I am never going to be the person who doesn't try to fix a problem article or try to save one that comes into my radar if its possible. SusunW (talk) 09:21, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Does that mean that you're going to continue to remove catimprove in circumstances like this one, or that you've agreed with my explanation above as to why it should stay? Sorry, but it's not clear from what you say! Pam  D  09:38, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Naomi McClure-Griffiths
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Hermine Speier
I've spent quite a bit of time tidying up the translation and trying to find references. Would you like to complete the references on the last part of the article? You did a pretty good job on the first part and could no doubt cite the same sources.--Ipigott (talk) 14:45, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the edits! I spent most of the day on it yesterday and told Dr. B I'd do the rest today. Thank you for your help. There is a book by Zander that I had asked Gerda to peruse, as it seems pretty extensive. It may have items to add, but I have no way to put it into a translator. Anyway, I'll see what I can do with the rest and then it will need another copyedit, I am sure. I also put a note on the weird PDF thing to alert people that it will open with Microsoft Word. I will try to tell Brown of the issue. SusunW (talk) 16:44, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I think I have done all that I can do with it. Still missing some citations, but I have no doubt that they can be found in those German books ;) SusunW (talk) 23:10, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I was able to access the Zanker book the other day but I can no longer turn it up as I have had too many views. I may be more successful from another computer. Otherwise I'll search for other sources and try to fill in the missing references.--Ipigott (talk) 09:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Looking great. A bit more and it'll be headed towards GA level!♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Copyeditting was very appreciated and made me nominate it

 * You are very welcome but you didn't have to credit me. ;) We CAN make this place a bit more friendly. I put a QPQ on the file as did you. Please keep yours for another file. SusunW (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Aviel Barclay
You're welcome! :) Yoninah (talk) 23:15, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Desert Inn
Hi. Can you try to work on the Desert Inn for a bit? There's more details on the interiors at here It could also use a search in Newspapers.com. I'll nom it for GA in a day or two once a few people have further looked at it. and may also add something further.♦  Dr. Blofeld  14:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Let me see what I can do. SusunW (talk) 14:31, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Just trying to make it as comprehensive as possible before I nom! ♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I added a lot from those 3 pages on Classic Las Vegas. BTW that picture of the Grand Lobby is from 2013. It can't be from the Desert Inn, right? Yoninah (talk) 21:16, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Sheraton Skyline Hotel at London Heathrow
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Elisa Oricchio
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your participation
 

Thanks for joining the Women in Religion Virtual Edit-a-thon, 5 to 15 December 2015, hosted by Women in Red. Over 125 articles were created or expanded. Your contributions are appreciated! Hope you will also join us for the WiR Women in Music Virtual Edit-a-thon from 10 to 31 January.--Ipigott (talk) 15:19, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Mónica Bettencourt-Dias
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Emīlija Gudriniece
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Native American artists from Oklahoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Osage. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Victoria Joyce Ely
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Wu Chengzhen
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy Holidays...
...and thank you for your work on DYK, Women in Red, and for all your thoughtful and truly extraordinary contributions to Wikipedia over the past year. It is very much noticed and appreciated! Vesuvius Dogg (talk) 02:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you . Hope you and yours have a lovely holiday season and that the new year captures your dreams. SusunW (talk) 17:10, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Al Maghtas
Can you kindly review this Template:Did you know nominations/Al Maghtas so that it can appear on the Chrsitmas day.-- Nvvchar . 02:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC) , I looked at it. Please be sure to ping me, as there is a lot to do and there isn't much time to make Christmas. SusunW (talk) 19:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. I don't think this can go through as many editors have added unreferenced text and Alt Hooks. I have requested them to address the issues. Nvvchar . 04:18, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's greetings

 * Thank you . I wish you and yours the desires of your heart and hope that your next trip around the sun finds you healthy and happy with many days full of love and laughter. SusunW (talk) 02:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Gerontissa Gavrielia
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

 * wishing you the best for the coming year. I can never thank you enough for all of your mentoring. May you have a healthy and happy new year. :) SusunW (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings


Dear SusunW: I imagine you're entertaining right now, but as soon as you see this message, you'll know that I'm thinking of you. I want to wish you and yours a warm and wonderful holiday season. I value your dedication and contributions to Wikipedia, and look forward to seeing more of them in 2016! Best, Yoninah (talk) 21:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you, your note made me smile. I am most appreciative of the collaborative spirit we have been able to build after a bit of a rocky start. I am truly grateful for your help in learning this crazy system we call WP. Hoping you and your family are able to share love and laughter in the season and that you have a healthy and happy 2016. SusunW (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Yoninah (talk) 21:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Mary Frances Clarke
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Marija Krucifiksa Kozulić
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Beverly Thomas Galloway
Hi, I just wanted to explain that I pinged you on the discussion page because you, as the reviewer, do have a say in how the hook is worded. The nominator may refute your objection, but it's important that you state it. Frankly, too many dry and boring hooks are being passed because the reviewer isn't saying anything. Best, Yoninah (talk) 19:08, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks . I appreciate your perspective. I am always leery, as it would be my POV. If the hook is wrong, obviously, I want it corrected, but if the information is accurate, and I find it distasteful or boring, how is that just not me? Censorship to me is a slippery slope, but maybe its just that I don't like to make waves. Way too many reviewers of DYK are not very nice, supportive, or proactive in their assessments, it seems to me. I also find it weird that the reviewer cannot propose something that is supported without recusing themselves as the reviewer, but that's again my POV. SusunW (talk) 19:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I realize that you are the consummate hostess, making sure everyone's comfortable! Regarding your latter point, reviewers shouldn't review their own suggestions from the point of view of independent verification. From the initial review to prep building and queue promotion, different sets of eyes are supposed to look at the hook to make sure it's accurate ... and even then, errors are found by readers when it hits the main page. I have often recused myself from a review in order to propose a better hook – which serves the purposes of DYK much better, I think. Yoninah (talk) 19:38, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I learn new ways to look at this crazy system every day And yes, it is always my hope that if a mistake is made, someone will catch it. Try as we will, we can be assured there will be mistakes. I cleared 3 last week that just seemed to be hanging waiting on someone to clear a newly proposed hook. It seems to me that sometimes those get hung up when actually it's a fairly simple clear since (hopefully) the rest of the review has already been done. I guess people don't want to do them because they don't really count as a QPQ, but I just figure it's being neighborly. :) SusunW (talk) 19:53, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Foreign Service officers
Sure - I'll take a look and see what I can dig up. Probably won't be until after dinner, tho'. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 22:34, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I've created it, as it doesn't seem to exist anywhere. I suspect it hasn't been created because we have categories for the various ambassadors, and also, so it would be viewed as unnecessary.  And I'm not quite sure where in the tree it belongs as yet, but I'll work that out some more later. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 22:47, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK
Hello! Your submission of Edith Irby Jones at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 07:52, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Lydia Emelie Gruchy
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Desert Inn
Allen3 talk 12:04, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year
Happy New Year, Susun, to you and your family, and thanks for the unbelievable number of contributions you made over the past year! Looking forward to further collaboration in 2016.--Ipigott (talk) 14:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you . I so appreciate all of my mentors on here. Could not have written so many and would not still be writing on here without you all. Wishing you a healthy and happy new year as well. My family starts arriving today. I am getting excited for their visit. SusunW (talk) 14:51, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ida Silverman
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ida Silverman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 11:21, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Ida Silverman
Hi, I read through the article and made some grammatical tweaks along the way. I also added subheads and found a few more sources. It reads well and is certainly ready for a start-class article. Good work! Yoninah (talk) 23:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * One discrepancy: The Rhode Island Jewish Historical Notes pamphlet (p. 127) said she helped build 80 synagogues during the last two years of her life when she lived in Israel. But your newspaper source says she built the synagogues with her husband in the 1960s. Yoninah (talk) 00:04, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! . I'm almost finished, well, maybe. Doing a bit of tweaking here and there. Found some sources with the Jewish Telegraphic Agency that add a bit of depth to the world affairs. I tend to think that accounts closer to when the events happened are usually more accurate. There are various mentions in the newspaper accounts, 30 synagogues built, 60 synagogues built, etc., thus I tend to think the newspaper accounts are more correct. But, I honestly don't know. Fascinating lady, that's for sure. SusunW (talk) 00:11, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Personally, I would rely on the Rhode Island Jewish Historical Association more than the newspapers. Yoninah (talk) 00:15, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * O I found another article, and tweaked that part, expanded the lede, and added a summation of her 600,000 miles. It's published. Feel free to make any changes you think will make it more accurate or better.
 * Wow! Great job! Are you going to nominate it for DYK, or should I? Yoninah (talk) 12:52, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I was toying with whether we should go for GA? Once I figured out to search under Mrs. Archibald I found so many more sources, that it went way beyond start. What do you think? SusunW (talk) 15:00, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * You could go for GA, but I think you need images to make the article more complete. Perhaps User:Dr. Blofeld could help in that department? Yoninah (talk) 15:43, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Funnily enough I looked at it about an hour ago and thought it had GA potential. I was going to upload a fair use image for you, there;s one which looks liek a locket which looks good but would need to be shrunken down. I'm in my super lazy mode at the moment though, must be all the Christmas food making me tired haha! I think Susun without much extra work you could get it to GA. I think I could muster enough energy to review it for you once done!♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * there's one newspaper image that was fairly clear. I am fairly sure it fits in the 1923-? time frame (its from the 1930s) and would be PD. Not sure which image you found Dr. B. SusunW (talk) 16:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Is it pre 1923? If not it won't be free.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:17, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I just realized that. There are some before 1923, but they are awful, totally black and unrecognizable. This is the one I marked as a good photo ... but if I clip it, it is really grainy. I don't know how  gets amazing images, but he took one on a recent file from [this see page 2 to [[Edith Mansford Fitzgerald]]. I only wish I had that skill. So, I'm guessing it would have to be fair use. SusunW (talk) 16:25, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the photos Dr. B. I've kind of been in and out all day. Got folks on their way in on the bus, so am getting ready and then my mom will be here in two days. My busy time family time is now. ;) I've read back through it and checked references. I think she's pretty well set. The only thing I am not sure of is whether I need to specify in the lede that her VPs were honorary. To me, it doesn't matter, as she was still the only woman and I discussed in the article how she used that to her advantage. Several sources don't indicate that they were voluntary, but I am positive they were. I don't want anyone to think it is misleading. What are your thoughts? SusunW (talk) 22:50, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I did some more checking around the internet and added a source, but everything already seems to be mentioned in your article. Regarding the honorary vice presidencies: maybe all of the executive positions at Hadassah and American Jewish Congress are voluntary? The pictures are terrific, thanks, . I think it's ready for GA. Yoninah (talk) 00:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, well then, I pushed the button. I nominated it under World History. SusunW (talk) 00:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Good luck! (When you're ready, I have a DYK hook in mind.) Yoninah (talk) 00:32, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Very cool. Look at all the photos found! I'll check in, but suspect I'll be off more than on for the next 10 days. My first batch of family arrived last night, more are on the way today, and then mama arrives on New Year Day. Happy New Year to you both. Thank you so much for your help. SusunW (talk) 17:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Meherzia Labidi Maïza
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Angela Palacious
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Ardina Moore
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)