User talk:Suthera

Welcome!
Hello, Suthera, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Thoughtonomy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! User:Gmaildamn (User talk:Gmaildamn) 13:45, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Thoughtonomy


A tag has been placed on Thoughtonomy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. User:Gmaildamn (User talk:Gmaildamn) 13:53, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Thoughtonomy, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:07, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thoughtonomy


A tag has been placed on Thoughtonomy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: discussion at Talk:Thoughtonomy
Given that talk page is likely to be deleted, I am copying our conversation from there here, so that it will not be lost and you can see it.

Contested deletion
Thoughtonomy Ltd has the following online presence: Partnership - Use Case - Partnership - Membership - Company Check - Company Check - Company check - Employment Opportunities - Research Councils - ... ... Suthera (talk) 14:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC) Reliable Sources Journal Publication - Company director quote from a successful project meeting secondary source and exhibition at national event Suthera (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC) That's all the recent pieces I have on file, I'm happy that they are classified under primary sources. Can we proceed? Also would you recommend building the page in sandbox first? Thanks for you help. Suthera (talk) 15:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The existence of something does not mean we should have an article about it. That this is a company does not make it meet Notability (organizations and companies). --Hammersoft (talk) 13:54, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok, online presence. But how does this go to meet notability at described at Notability (organizations and companies)? Are there notable secondary sources indicating the notability of this company? --Hammersoft (talk) 15:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * An abstract isn't a secondary source. A press release about presenters to a conference isn't a secondary source either. The reference to Computacenter partnering with them isn't a secondary source either; they're talking about themselves partnering with them. That's a primary source. Anything else? --Hammersoft (talk) 15:50, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Absolutely! Please do work on it in your sandbox. You might also want to see Article wizard. But, please do be aware of our conflict of interest guideline. If you have questions, leave me a message on my talk page. I'd be happy to help. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)