User talk:Suttonpubcrawl

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. - Lucky 6.9 03:18, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Dickyblackwood.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dickyblackwood.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 03:06, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Vile
I put it to you, Suttonpubcrawl, that you are a Verbwhore of the highest order. HornetMike 20:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Dickyblackwood.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dickyblackwood.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  17:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Rock cakes
A template has been added to the article Rock cakes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. •  nancy  • 17:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Crossways Estate.jpg
Hi Suttonpubcrawl, At Commons we are in a test phase of a new project called Valued images. The purpose of the project is to recognise valued images within a specific scope and some test nominations and reviews are onging here. One of the current candidates is realting to highrise appartments. I think there are other images around, which are at least as valuable illustrations of highrise appartments. The image: Image:Crossways Estate.jpg of your for example. I would like to make the current candidate image compete with your image in what is called a Most valued review. However that requires that your image is also uploaded to Commons and that it is properly categorized and geocoded too and meets certain other criteria. Interested? If yes, do not hesitate to contact me if you need help. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome back
Just noticed you because of your name and thought I would welcome you back to the wiki. I hope you get back into the site and decide to keep editing. Does your name refer to Sutton Coldfield? I don't know how many pubs there are there. Sticky Parkin 23:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Travelex group
A tag has been placed on Travelex group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 09:56, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Your claims regarding The Travelex Group
Which part of the text "The Travelex Group is a limited company headquartered on Kingsway in London, in the UK. Its main businesses are international payments, currency exchange and issuing prepaid credit cards for use by travellers" says that the group is "the world's largest non-bank wholesale foreign exchange supplier and the world’s largest non-bank provider of commercial cross-border payment services"? The article doesn't support what you've said about the company. In addition please tell me how Travelex Group satisfies specific parts of our notability criteria. Kimchi.sg (talk) 13:34, 4 September 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, I'm convinced! Travelex Group is blue again. Kimchi.sg (talk) 12:35, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Barbicanestatefromabove.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:53, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

BLP
PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrs Hinch. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! —— Serial  14:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

I don't see any reason to assume good faith from people who flout their own rules and do not assume good faith of me. Suttonpubcrawl (talk) 15:22, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

UK by-election records article
Hey Suttonpubcrawl.

Right, well. It's fairly clear you don't like me much. For the avoidance of doubt, I don't like you much either. But we are where we are. I nominated one article for AfD and you attacked me, insulted me, had abusive messages expunged from the record, and ultimately won the argument. We now find ourselves in an unnecessary edit war about the by-election records page.

Look, I love that article. I tend and maintain and keep the records article the best that I can make it. I know it needs a lot more citations. I know it needs trimming. Had the AfD been successful it would have broken my heart, it's one of my few happy places on the Internet, not just Wikipedia. BUT, I really struggle with your editing style, I really struggle with your attitude. I really struggle with knowing if we'll have any middle ground.

If you believe, in all sincerity, that sortable tables are the way ahead for almost all the tables on the article, go ahead, make them sortable. I have doubts. I have concerns. I have my own preferences. But I just want to keep that article the decent and well-read resource it is. Sortable tables, I can live with. And we might fight and scrap and sneer in the process of making it a better article, though maybe that's the price I pay for wanting to preserve everything the way it is.

Let's try and do something constructive. doktorb wordsdeeds 23:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)