User talk:Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida

Welcome!
Hello, Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! The king of the sun (talk) 22:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida


A tag has been placed on User:Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is an "attack page" or an unsourced biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity, or articles about living people that are entirely negative and unsourced. Attack pages, attack files and negative unreferenced BLPs are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The king of the sun (talk) 22:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 22:31, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

it is a case in history and I am the holder.

The deletion is contested whereby holder of the case, Rodriguez v Florida is myself-Suzette Grace Rodriguez. Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 22:33, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 22:38, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

The page is in contest whereby the case holder of Rodriguez v Florida is myself-Suzette Grace Rodriguez.

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You grossly misunderstand the purpose of this website.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Block Appeal
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Suzette_Grace_Rodriguez_v._Florida Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 17:40, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

I need to begin my article. Please advise. Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 16:44, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * This is an online encyclopedia, not a venue for your to write about legal cases in which you're personally involved. You are blocked from editing here and will not be unblocked in order to misuse this website.-- Ponyo bons mots 17:41, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

There are many cases listed into the encyclopedia. Why is mine specifically being discriminated against? Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 17:44, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * There are cases that represent novel and precedent-setting instances in law that have been discussed in widely-published reliable sources. They are not written by the individuals involved in the case, using Wikipedia as a WP:SOAPBOX.-- Ponyo bons mots 17:48, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Okay. Then who wants to assist me with the article? Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 17:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You are not understanding. Wikipedia is not a venue to publish information about the court case. Start a blog or create a website. It does not belong here.-- Ponyo bons mots 17:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

I don't think that you understand. There are many cases for research into the encyclopedia which means that my article is being discriminated, against. Is this the only option to proceed? Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 17:56, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * This is a private website, you have no inherent right to publish anything here, especially when such writing run afoul of our policies and guidelines. You can appeal your block by following the instructions in the block message, but no administrator will unblock you in order for you to write about your court case. As you have shown no desire to listen to what I've been explaining to you regarding the inappropriateness of your use of this website, I won't be replying further.-- Ponyo bons mots 18:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

I'm reviewing the guidelines and policies. Im certain that's the direction that you're forcing me to take. Even a reader of this thread could read that I'm being singled out; a legal case is with evidence and in recorded in history. The search engine deserves full transparency, therefore, this block is a breach. Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 18:09, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

What is the status of my block appeal? Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 22:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Reason for unblock-misunderstanding of creation that lead to false allegations by Ponyo.

Unblock
Yamia- It is not a rule for all of 910 administrators to deny a creation by false allegations. The accusation is cleared by my efforts under the guidelines for unblocking. Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 16:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Yami Ponyo Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 18:45, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

331dot Thank you. The only option available to me is consensus talk or arb email. Would you like to discuss the block? Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 21:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC) Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

331dot

Arbitration refuses to respond following an edit warr started by Ponyo of false accusations of my creation that has blocked my editing. Can we resolve this by consensus? Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 22:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * The problem is you. You need to clearly explain why your edits were inappropriate and convince us you understand what Wikipedia is all about and specifically what it is not about... it is not the place for you to pursue your grievances. Your behaviour so far has been vexatious. You are very, very close to losing talk page access. If your only goal is to right great wrongs, you aren't welcome here; see WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. Think carefully before writing anything else. You have almost exhausted our patience here and have been incredibly disruptive. It must stop now. --Yamla (talk) 22:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

From the beginning I was accused of being unworthy to the encyclopedia by Ponyo; he began blocked all of my edits for arbitration only. There, we have this edit war until I receive resolution option. Per the policy my creation comes WITH evidence & citations. These cont allegations and dirty allegations of my article are vixacous. Suzette Grace Rodriguez v. Florida (talk) 22:52, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:44, 2 March 2023 (UTC)