User talk:Suziemarin

Welcome! ''' Hello, Suziemarin, and welcome to Wikipedia! This is one of the most popular websites in the world, and it's only through the contributions of editors like you. And Wikipedia is not just a collection of articles, it's an active community. The real fun here is contributing to Wikipedia, but don't feel hurt if some of your first few edits get removed, as there are some central guidelines you may not be familiar with.

Some good advice: be bold in your editing, and use the talk pages to discuss with other editors. Be kind to others, because there's a lot you can learn from them, and there's lots they can help you with.

There's lots of resources to help you become a great editor, from our basic introduction to our in-depth manual. But if you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, you can just type  on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. And if you haven't done so, tell us a bit about yourself. If you need some help, visit the Teahouse Q&A board. Oh, and please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

Glad you're here! Olision889 (talk) 01:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC) Olision889 (talk) 01:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Suziemarin, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 03:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review - Taryn Steckler
It seems like you have a good start for your information. The information is a little hard to read through at this stage though. Once you get all of it organized and add some sentences instead of just bullet points that will really help. I had trouble finding very much information on my scholar as well, but I found that once I put some headings in and organized what information I did have, it looked more complete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TSteck23 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:HeadshotOfSusanZaeske.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HeadshotOfSusanZaeske.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 03:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review - Taryn Steckler
This looks really good! You have a ton of information on your scholar which is really good. The only thing I would recommend is that with the beginning section where you have all her background information, maybe break that up into sections so it is a little easier to read through. I think it was a good choice to go through and list all her awards and classes and what not in individual sections. There seems to be a ton of information which is good, as long as it is all relevant to her as a scholar. As far as I could tell it is. Good job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TSteck23 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Susan Zaeske
Hello, Suziemarin. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Susan Zaeske, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Susan Zaeske to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

 Onel 5969  TT me 13:07, 28 April 2017 (UTC)