User talk:Suzier444

June 2014
Hello, I'm K6ka. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jeff Smisek with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 14:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Jeff Smisek. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 14:52, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Jeff Smisek. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. —S MALL JIM   14:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Important note RE Jeff Smisek
Hello. I noticed that you persistently removed sourced content from the article Jeff Smisek, without providing an explanation. Please note that, unless the content is unsourced (meaning there are no citations to back it up or support it) and defamatory, content usually stays, as long as it's written in a neutral point of view. The passage you just removed was sourced and was written in a neutral tone, so there's no reason why it needs to be removed. In the future, instead of continually reverting to your preferred version (which is seen as edit warring and can get you blocked), you should make your case on the talk page of the article. Thank you. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 15:02, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Important note RE Jeff Smisek
Cut it out on the Smisek page. This is your last warning. If you keep it up, I will ask Wikipedia to freeze the page. You have been warned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.134.98.191 (talk) 13:38, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jeff Smisek with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 19:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Jeff Smisek. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 02:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Jeff Smisek
I'm not sure why this article wouldn't be important. While it could be considered "opinionated" - aren't most of the others? They are reports given by someone with an opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pc72orf (talk • contribs) 23:18, 23 February 2015 (UTC) Not to mention the fact that it is a letter specifically addressed to Jeff Smisek.