User talk:Svetlyo

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles 06:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Dear Charles, I'm reverting to save my votes because someone was reverting to remove it. Also you can't add your opinion about the vote before the vote,\"a greek republican who is narrow minded and acts according to his feelings but the right thing is to vote for us and blah blah blah. Please use the discussion Svetlyo 06:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC) - Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Please stop removing other editors comments.
Don't alter or remove comments made by others please. If you continue to do that I'll block you from editing for a period of time. Please, like I said on the talk page, work it out by debate/discussion. Removing comments is considered very poor form and vandalism. Let me know if you have any questions. Rx StrangeLove 07:15, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

You do realise that if the article stays at Anne-Marie of Greece you are saying that she is a reigning monarch, not the consort of a former or exiled king. All monarchs are listed in the form  of country. All living consorts and former consorts are in the form  of country to distinguish them from monarchs, with they reverting to the form  of  or maiden name if non-royal, on death. Do you really want Wikipedia to suggest that Anne-Marie is the current queen-regnant of Greece, just as Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom is queen-regnant of the UK? That is what your vote would result in, a 100% wrong name.

The international rules on exiled royalty is clear and used worldwide.
 * Where a monarch freely abdicates, they are referred to as ex-king and ex-queen.
 * Where a monarch is deposed (whether by coup, revolution or referendum) but they do not abdicate, they are referred to by their former constitutional title as what is called a courtesy title for the remainder of their lifetime.

As Constantine never abdicated, he is known internationally in republics and monarchies alike as King Constantine of Greece. The French Republic calls him that. The United States calls him that. The Republic of Ireland calls him that. The Republic of South Africa calls him that. They all make it clear that he is not the reigning king of Greece as there is no such person anymore, merely that he is a one-time king in exile. It is the same principle that sees former US presidents referred to as President, former US senators called Senator. Former ambassadors in much of the world still called Ambassador. They are courtesy titles, not statements that they still hold their former office. FearÉIREANN \(caint) 17:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Sockpuppet block
THIS IS NOT TRUE! PLEASE BRING BACK MY USERACCOUNT AND DO SO FOR MY FRIENDS (COCOS AND JTCD MIGHT BE BUT NOT ALL OF US) SVETLYO

Image Tagging Image:Orkomosia juntas.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Orkomosia juntas.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 22:13, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Apostasia 1965.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Apostasia 1965.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 22:19, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:News glykxboorg.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:News glykxboorg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

File:News glykxboorg.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:News glykxboorg.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 18:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)