User talk:Svilenv

Speedy deletion nomination of Antidemon


A tag has been placed on Antidemon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Dream out loud (talk) 18:56, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Toronto-Dominion Bank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scotiabank, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CBC and The Star. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:10, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright violations on Scotiabank
I realize that your edits were made back in November of 2014, but I just noticed that your additions to the Scotiabank article were directly copied from on-line articles. That's not permitted here as it's a clear copyright violation. The sections had to be deleted and rewritten completely. When you're adding information to an article, you need to summarize what's in the sources in your own words, not directly copy them. I do appreciate that you included the sources as it made recreating the section much easier. Please though, when you make edits in the future, summarize the information and don't just copy it. Thanks! Ravensfire ( talk ) 16:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2017
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Walking with the Enemy. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Paris1127 (talk) 05:49, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sweden. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 19:41, 6 August 2018 (UTC) Please, kindly explain if the only changes to the Sweden articles of adding double"[" tag around different country names - is this really a vandalism? Thanks. Svilenv (talk) 19:50, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * You also added "germany" after the native name of the country, and that's what you were warned for... - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 20:04, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I apologize, the one extra word meant to be used in my find browser menu - "copy/paste" error, but no intended vandalism on any sort "languages of Sweden:germany" - I am sure you realize my intent was not malicious. We just hosted exchange student facilitated by an attache from this country. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sweden&oldid=853743500 - with my typo (under the Notes and languages section ... ) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sweden&oldid=853749777 - with the reverted content (the other country wiki tags removed as well ... but I agree that languages of Sweden are what they are now)

I will be much more careful, in general and especially, if I decide to change Sweden's article (with these regretful tags) and in anyways. And in either way if you messaged me I would have changed the article (fix the error)

Thanks for the help. Svilenv (talk) 20:20, 6 August 2018 (UTC)