User talk:SvonFNotH90

Welcome!
 Hello, SvonFNotH90, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
 * The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

SvonFNotH90, good luck, and have fun. &#8209;&#8209; El Hef  ( Meep? ) 18:08, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Editing on climate change mitigation
Femke (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia editing. I have just reverted two of your edits. If you disagree, you are welcome to open up a discussion on Talk:energy transition and Talk:100% renewable energy, to either compromise or to find out if there is consensus on these changes despite objections. You may want to familiarise yourself with the policy of WP:Neutral point of view and WP:words to watch. Femke (talk) 13:03, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The page "100% renewable energy" is clearly impractical and Wikipedia does not acknowledge this fact? SvonFNotH90 (talk) 12:43, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You'll be most succesfull in changing the article by engaging on the talk page with good sources, rather than reverting. (fyi, I do agree that 100% renewable energy can use a tweak in the direction you're proposing). Femke (talk) 16:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the notice. Luckily our kids know not to rely on Wikipedia for information and would realise that the page is a bit of a 'fanfic' as noted by someone else on the talk page who suggested removal of '100%'. And, if that one point has not been taken seriously since 2017, despite the legal claims of Mark Z Jacobson having been thrown out of court, and so many people deliberately removing any factual references I try to share that point out relevance of numbers and anti-nuclear sentiment within the green agenda, there is very little chance of anything further I suggest making a difference. I don't get paid to be here, unlike the pro-renewable fantasists who refuse to accept truth over ideology. SvonFNotH90 (talk) 16:52, 3 July 2022 (UTC)


 * if you ever decide to come back, please bear in mind that a continued WP:focus on content is the best way forward. Insulting people and caring aspersions about WP:paid editing will not get you far. Femke (talk) 18:09, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, it wasn't meant to be an insult and I do appreciate your feedback. What I say is from experience. I don't know your personal background.
 * We all have different perspectives, so what I say above could seem like an aspersion, but I am simply being honest in acknowledging that the logic as to how anyone might expect sunshine and wind - even with hydro-electricity is flawed and cannot be trusted. Without honest and open explanations, we have blind spots in the rationale. The message is becomes muddied and biased against real solutions. I just hope that more and more people are realising that the blind spots become a weakness that can be exploited, if inadvertently, by the fossil fuel industry. SvonFNotH90 (talk) 12:51, 4 July 2022 (UTC)