User talk:Svraghavan27

January 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Thalaivaa has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Thalaivaa was changed by Svraghavan27 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875454 on 2014-01-08T17:56:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:56, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vijay Raghavan


A tag has been placed on Vijay Raghavan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Peppy Paneer (talk) 05:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Vijay (actor), you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 14:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''

There is a very real and important difference between "one survey claims that [x] is the most popular actor" and "[x] is the most popular actor". As it turns out, the source states clearly that the basis for the survey results is unconfirmed and nobody knows how it was conducted, so it can't be included at all. Please take a moment to familiarise yourself with how Wikipedia defines verifiability and reliable sources. Thank you! bonadea'' contributions talk 10:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

March 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Veeram. You seem to have a problem with vandalizing Indian film articles  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 19:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)