User talk:Svrznik

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Dispenza


A tag has been placed on Joe Dispenza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Joe Dispenza. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 (talk) 17:16, 6 January 2020 (UTC)


 * So, there's not really much of my "judgement" involved in this. What was said about the 2010 article still completely applied to the new article, and so I'm really just working as a functionary.  If you're interested in writing an article about him, it may be possible, but you would need to publications about him by third parties with good reputations for fact checking and the like - the usual inclusion criterion for Wikipedia is explained here.  Since you indicate you have some specific interest, I'll also point you towards this guideline on writing style - very basically, Wikipedia articles should be written so that everyone would agree on what's written (this is usually done by ascribing non-consensus views explicitly to the people who hold them), and so the balance of emphasis reflects the balance of emphasis in the sources.  Teahouse is probably the best place to pose questions. Cheers, Wily D  05:52, 7 January 2020 (UTC)