User talk:Swagarms4reason44

October 2014
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Siege of Jerusalem (587 BC)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a &#123;&#123;Talkback&#125;&#125; message on my talk page. @ 03:24, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Siege of Jerusalem (587 BC) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a &#123;&#123;Talkback&#125;&#125; message on my talk page. @ 03:25, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Emperor Jimmu, you may be blocked from editing.  ミーラー強斗武  (StG88ぬ会話) 04:40, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of the Somme.  ミーラー強斗武  (StG88ぬ会話) 04:43, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Balkot, Lumbini with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —Frosty ☃ 05:11, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chicago, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Chicago was changed by Swagarms4reason44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.987354 on 2014-10-30T05:14:30+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:14, 30 October 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 05:40, 30 October 2014 (UTC)