User talk:Swaggart

Do not vandalise Wikipedia. You have been warned. Dunc_Harris|&#9786; 12:05, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * How is chick.com relevant to a sensible encyclopedia article? And sorry, yes, I overstepped the mark you are not a malicious vandal, simply a clueless newbie, which we all were once, but please if you are going to contribute, contribute something worthwhile, otherwise it just creates work for the rest of us. Dunc_Harris|&#9786; 12:10, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Please, add only relevant links to the external links section of articles. Links to webcomis are usually not really relevant (If they would be, we could add thousands of external links to many articles). --Conti|&#9993; 12:11, Oct 10, 2004 (UTC)

For a discussion of the policies Dunc_Harris and Conti are referring to, please see Neutral point of view and Spam. Gazpacho 12:18, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Hi Swaggart welcome to Wikipedia. I'm afraid that your page "Jesus biography" has been listed on Votes for Deletion, and is almost certainly going to be deleted. This is because that page simply presents your version of Jesus' life as though it were fact. The point of Wikipedia is to present information to people. So, on the Jesus page both the belief that he is the Son of God, our Saviour, and the belief that he possibly didn't even exist are discussed. It's then upto people to make up their own minds- based partly on the extra information we've given them. Wikipedia is not the place to present one-sided biographies of people, which probably a large proportion of Christians wouldn't accept, let alone anyone else! If you read the pages that Gazpacho has suggested and read some of the discussions we've had on the Talk:Jesus and Talk:Christianity pages then you should get a better idea of how to help this project. I hope that this helps! From G Rutter 12:35, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Oi! Wikipedia is not a soapbox for personal essays... Evercat 21:57, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)