User talk:Swagyolo69

May 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Australian_Mathematics_Competition, you may be blocked from editing.

You know it's untrue, I know it's untrue, yeah? He wasn't even in school for that long. I don't know whether the other three are correct, and I'm not really going to read through the reference to find out, but we both know that this one is a complete hoax. WP:DNCH thank you ~

Oh and by the way, that edit on Scotch is so obviously a vandalism edit... Seeing that the other guy was nice and followed WP:AGF to mark it as good faith, I'll respect that and not warn you for that particular edit. I will give you a level four next time though, even if someone else considers it to be good faith.

And to answer your question on the tram, vandalism is controlled by monitoring here or by using tools such as WP:HG and WP:STIKI.

Just... Keep in mind you're this close to being banned...

Command  Conquerer    Logs     11:24, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rumble the Siege Minion


The article Rumble the Siege Minion has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Hoax/Borderline patent nonsense. Does not cite any links, and references are obviously fake. Content is also largely untrue.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Command  Conquerer    Logs     08:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Marek69. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Melbourne because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Marek . 69  talk 04:05, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gattaca. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Marek . 69  talk 04:07, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wei Peng Soh
Hello Swagyolo69,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wei Peng Soh for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Egghead06 (talk) 05:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CensoredBiscuit. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Melbourne because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! CensoredBiscuit (talk) 03:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Violin Concerto (Beethoven) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 04:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)