User talk:Swalk1954

Welcome!
Hello, Swalk1954, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! TMCk (talk) 13:14, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 21:49, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 10 things you didnt know abut Fidel Castro


The article 10 things you didnt know abut Fidel Castro has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced trivia with inappropriate title for an Encyclopaedia entry.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 18:32, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Encouragement
Regarding 10 things you didnt know abut Fidel Castro, first you have made a typo (abut = about). Also, titles like these are not allowed in Wiki. I see that you have also requested an article for creation which was unfortunately rejected. I think some of the content can be twicked a bit and included in Fidel Castro's article especially under "childhood" (with the relevant sources), but it looks like it has been done already. This is just to give you an encouragement and to say don't give up even if this article is deleted. You can always create another with reliable sources. You can also test your articles on your own sandbox. If you need help with anything, message me on my talk page. Best Regards. Tamsier (talk)

Reply
Hi Swalk1954, just to let you know that I have replied to your message at my talk page. Best Regards. Tamsier (talk) 20:18, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Self-published works, and a possible conflict of interest.
I think that it reasonable to assume from your username that you are the author of Fidel Castro's Childhood: The Untold Story by Steven Walker, which you cited in a contribution to our Fidel Castro article. If this is the case, I'd suggest you familiarise yourself with Wikipedia policy regarding conflicts of interest, and with our policy regarding reliable sources. The book appears to be self-published, and as such unlikely to be seen as a sufficiently reliable source for a high-profile article on a controversial living person - at least until it has been given recognition e.g. by citation in other reputable published sources. In any case, a substantial body of text such as that which you added would need multiple cited sources, and it is entirely inappropriate for a Wikipedia contributor to be adding substantial portions of self-cited text without making a possible conflict of interest known. As for your book, I've not read it, and will make no judgement either way regarding it's merits (it is not the job of Wikipedia contributors to do such things - we leave this to academia, to book reviewers etc), and I wish you well regarding its publication - but it is unlikely to be seen as a suitable source for the article concerned. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:24, 22 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I see that you have ignored my comments above, and again attempted to cite this self-published work in the article. . If you persist in doing this without first clarifying your possible relationship with the author of the book, and without discussing on the article talk page (or other appropriate Wikipedia venue, i.e. Reliable sources/Noticeboard) its validity as a source, I shall report the matter at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard - we do not allow contributors to promote non-notable works (regardless of authorship), and we take a very dim view of those who appear to be doing so for their own benefit. Of course it is entirely possible that you aren't the author of the work - in which case I suggest that you should take a look at our WP:REALNAME policy. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Just wanted to clarify for the reviewer Andy the Grump that my work is self-published but based on thorough research as evidenced in the references and extensive bibliography. I have published 9 books before with mainstream publishers so my track record of accuracy, and fidelity speaks for itself.Self publishing the work cited: Fidel Castro's Childhood- the untold story was a way of ensuring historical accuracy regarding this living person, plus enabling me to donate 10% royalities to a children's orphanage in Cuba.My small edits on 23 July are revisions of previous contributions, and in my view are fully compliant with Wikipedia guidelines. In addition they do add another perspective to Fidel Castro's complex personality. My book is being reviewed currently by several relevant magazines, as well as individuals and is due to feature in The Catholic Herald newspaper in the UK.Swalk1954 (talk) 11:29, 24 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swalk1954 (talk • contribs) 11:27, 24 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I think your best course is to raise the matter at Reliable sources/Noticeboard, explaining the situation (including your authorship of the work), and asking for wider input. I'd not get your hopes up though, as our standards are high regarding sources for high profile articles, and we have to take particular care with biographies of living persons - we'd expect to use sources with a proven track record in the particular subject area, particularly for controversial issues. However, there is an alternative approach - since presumably you have references for the material for your book, it may be possible to cite them instead for any additions to the Castro article, assuming that they meet our reliability requirements. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:29, 24 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I am an expert in the field of child psychology- hence the title of the book, multiple references and my own publications within the subject area. I have cited 2 other publications in the small revision.

Swalk1954 (talk) 15:56, 24 July 2012 (UTC)