User talk:Swallow2011


 * }

See also: Pumpable ice technology
The "See also" section of articles is for "relevant links that would be in the body of a hypothetical perfect article". I am hard pressed to see how many of the articles you are adding it to should have links to this article. Compare the links you placed it alongside. The others in Italian ice are all frozen deserts. Fish processing? Salmon cannery (where a type of fish is processed). Energy policy of the European Union? European Atomic Forum, European Commissioner for Energy, Energy Efficiency in Europe, etc. - SummerPhD (talk) 19:01, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Dear SummerPhD, First of all, thank you for your comments and critics. I am sorry if I did something wrong. At the same time, I thought (may be, my understanding is not right) that by this way and according to my vision, it is possible to pay attention on the fact that hundreds of engineers and scientists in the world have developed the very original technology which can be used in different applications. At my point of view, in the hypothetical perfect article it shoud be mentioned any aspect allowing to look on the subject of article from different angles. Pumpable ice technology is the shortest way to solve, at least, partly the energetic crisis during nearest ten years. I'll be pleased to get your experienced and professional recommendations in order to correct my activities. I stopped any my activities in Wiki until getting your answer. Best regards Swallow2011
 * The hypothetical perfect article would not include any information based on your belief that the technology is the solution to anything. Italian ice has an obvious connection to other frozen deserts. If pumpable ice technology is used in Italian ice production, there is no indication of it that I can find. The case is the same for the others listed. - SummerPhD (talk) 01:47, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Dear SummerPhD, I suggest to be polite. The second, I am not surprised if you can not find relative information about both pumpable ice technology and physical freezing process for a production of all frozen beverages with different trademarks and additives. I am a specialist of refrigeration techniques but for me it is difficult too to find the relative information. Even catalogs of beverage freezer suppliers do not include the real information about construction of freezers. On other side, any reader of Wiki articles about different kinds of frozen beverages has full rights to get the short qualified information (only link !) regarding the production process of product. That is why, I am not agree with your remark. I hope, in the presence of your desire, you'll understand my explanations and intends to increase the quality of Wiki articles. Best regards Swallow2011 (talk) 08:23, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * If you cannot cite a reliable source for the information, it does not belong in Wikipedia. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Dear SummerPhD, I cite a reliable source for the information about technology and refrigeration equipment of ice cream, different frozen beverages production. It does belong in Wikipedia. Please, look cite number 21 in the article. BR Swallow2011 (talk) 18:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Dated clean-up tags
Hi, thanks for your message, Helpful Pixie Bot does not generally add these kind of tags, but merely dates those that are already there. If you believe the issues have subsequently been addressed, it is perfectly OK to remove them. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 19:57, 3 March 2012 (UTC).


 * Dear Rich Farmbrough, The first, thank you for your fast answer. 2nd, I am sure, the text can be improved. Unfortunately, my knowledge in Wiki, really, is negligible. that is why, sorry for my request, please, remove Dated clean-up tags. If you can too, please, suggest the attractive article (by structure and subject) for improving. Thank you in advance. I wish you the efficient activities in Wiki. BR Swallow2011 (talk) 20:33, 3 March 2012 (UTC)