User talk:Swanseaeu1

License tagging for Image:All Saints.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:All Saints.jpeg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 02:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:AS logo 3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AS logo 3.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 03:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Please make your edits on the England article again
I had to use a sledgehammer revert to remove a large number of bad edits and your edits got consumed also, for which I apologise. Robertbyrne 15:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Option Appraisal
A tag has been placed on Option Appraisal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash; B o L 01:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Economic appraisal‎
I am concerned about your recent edit to Economic appraisal‎. While the original article was not perfect, I am not convinced that wholesale replacement with an entirely unsourced stub as you did was appropriate. If you are going to make radical changs to articles you should first reach consensus with other editors on the article's talk page and you should always use edit summaries. Thanks, Gwernol 01:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Please discuss your proposed edit to Economic appraisal with other editors before making it, and please start using edit summaries to explain what you are doing. Otherwise it looks a lot like you are trying to push your own point of view into Wikipedia articles. If you continue to do with without discussing your contributions, I will block you to prevent further disruption. Thanks, Gwernol 01:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


 * This is your final warning. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia by pushing your point of view, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 01:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Transcendence (talk) 01:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Halcrow logo.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Halcrow logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash; B o L 01:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:All Saints Peckham.JPG
File:All Saints Peckham.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:All Saints Peckham.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:15, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:ThamesHubOrbitalRail.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ThamesHubOrbitalRail.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:ThamesHubFloodProtection.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ThamesHubFloodProtection.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale in non-free images
Hi. The following non-free images related to Thames Hub are being considered for deletion. They're not discussed in the article by sourced commentary. In particular, the cover page of the report is not encyclopedic in this case. I hope you understand the reasoning, and will not be discouraged from further cotributions to Wikipedia in accordance with policies. Thanks. -- Trevj (talk) 10:23, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * File:ThamesHubCover.jpg
 * File:ThamesHubAirport.jpg
 * File:ThamesHubBarrier.jpg
 * File:ThamesHubAirport aerial.jpg
 * File:ThamesHub aerial.jpg
 * File:20 Fenchurch Street, City of London.jpg

Disambiguation link notification for October 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Airports Commission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of long term proposals received by Airports Commission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twyford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Thames Hub (disambiguation) was accepted
 Thames Hub (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Lugia2453 (talk) 20:16, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Merge discussion for Thames Hub Airport
An article that you have been involved in editing, Thames Hub Airport, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 12:20, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WebTAG


The article WebTAG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:50, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Present value of benefits


The article Present value of benefits has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unsourced, violating WP:V core content policy"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)