User talk:Swarajya History..

May 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:Sambhaji, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. – robertsky (talk) 08:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Sambhaji, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ''If you want to suggest changes to the article, please write a brief and neutrally worded post, including sources that directly support your change, and without any value laden statements. Threats to "make you pay for this very badly" are entirely unacceptable. bonadea'' contributions talk 08:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

First you tell me what souce you used to write this some incorrect information about the great king Sambhaji. There are very few nonsence books/writers who at one side doing defamation of Sambhaji while stating about his contribution and bravery on other side. How much this is logical you think. You just took the summery of these books and content of some distorted writers right. So there huge number of books who describes the real sambhaji which is proof of this that The true story is Sambhaji was an ideal king who didn't have any bad addiction and was a symbol for bravery and patriotism which he shown in his sacrifice. He was a great king that's how he managed to defeat Aurangzeb Right? How a king who is badly addicted can manage this? And why Shehenshah of Hindustan Aurangzeb can be so desperate to capture like such King which is coloured by some distorted writer? Use simple logic. Sambhaji is a god for many people so stop his defamation. Swarajya History.. (talk) 04:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC)


 * If you want to suggest changes to the article, please write a brief and neutrally worded post on the article talk page, including sources that directly support your suggested change, and without any value laden statements such as "nonsense books", "defamation", or "ideal king". You should also take care not to remove any of the existing talk page content, as you accidentally did here. --bonadea contributions talk 11:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

It looks as Some unrealistic events and Defamation about sambhaji made on Wikipedia is based on the articles of some distorted writers. Is that before publishing it on Wikipedia Google don't validate the articles? Because in your references links there are many references which you have given tells the real story about Sambhaji. I am from Sambhaji's Land and know the true facts however I can provide you the references from government site but those are in Marathi language, will that work? Swarajya History.. (talk) 10:04, 29 May 2021 (UTC)