User talk:Swarmjam

hey, test

Welcome!

 * }

CityXpress
The page CityXpress has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which is unlikely to be suitable for an article (or at best would need a fundamental rewrite). Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:55, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CityXpress


A tag has been placed on CityXpress, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Invitrovanitas (talk) 21:57, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CityXpress


A tag has been placed on CityXpress, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Invitrovanitas (talk) 22:02, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
This is your last warning; the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Invitrovanitas (talk) 22:02, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with CityXpress
Hello. Concerning your contribution, CityXpress, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.linkedin.com/companies/cityxpress-ltd. As a copyright violation, CityXpress appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. CityXpress has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:CityXpress and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:CityXpress with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:CityXpress.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Corvus cornix talk  22:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Krakatoa Katie  22:31, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Unblock Request
I work for CityXpress, I am NOT spamming anything. I am trying to create a legitimate article on out company and services. Please unblock me so I can learn how to do this properly.

It is copied from http://www.linkedin.com/companies/cityxpress-ltd As I work here ....


 * I understand, but there are a few points that need to be addressed before you can be unblocked. First off, the term spam is a bit deceptive, as it refers bot to repeated and indiscriminate posting of links and, well, spam all over the place, and also to articles that seem to be aimed at promoting a particular company or service. This falls under the latter, I believe, and the fact that you work for the company introduces a conflict of interest. The material is a violation of copyright as well, since it is taken from another website that does not license its content for that purpose - LinkedIn isn't a site where you can copy anything you like. You can identify yourself as the author of that content (see Contact us), but once it's posted here anyone can (and will) edit it, which many companies do not realize. If your firm is notable, chances are good that someone will write an article about them. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 19:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)