User talk:Swastik Mridha

Mr. Swastik don't delete someone else's content who is correct.. who are you ?? Owner of wiki ??

Query
Pangong tso is still in Indian territory or it is occupied by Chinese govt?? Can we go as a tourist there or we have to take permission from Chinese govt? Kindly reply my queries asap. Thank you!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:4900:1261:8150:2B1E:2D6A:DB47:6E21 (talk) 15:17, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Pangong Tso lake is distributed between Both India and China. From Indian side the lake is allowed to visit by Tourist but yes whether you are Indian or Foreigner you have to take a permit for which you have to give a small fee to the tourist office but yes you won't get any permit for boating on the lake. And I can't surely say whether the portion of the lake lying in Autonomous region of Tibet(China) is allowed to visit or not. Also due to the current clash between Indian and Chinese Forces. Civilians may not be allowed for sometime due to security purposes, even if the clash between both of them get's stopped.Swastik Mridha (talk) 18:31, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm Sarvatra. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, HAL Light Combat Helicopter, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 06:14, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

I had been recently going through some Newspaper regarding that the production of Of HAL Light Combat Helicopter has Started. So I thought of adding the change. I hope you understand my point Swastik Mridha (talk) 15:09, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Swastik Mridha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page List of equipment of the Indian Army did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Brown Chocolate (talk) 10:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey, Happy to see you again. Your recent changes on List of equipment of the Indian Army and HAL Light Combat Helicopter didn't provide any source. Just search the web and get a source. Then feel free to edit a page with source. If you need any help ask me on my talk page. Brown Chocolate (talk) 10:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

I was recently going through some of my daily Newspaper and the Newspaper claimed that the production of HAL Light Combat Helicopter has been started so I thought the source is okay and so I thought of adding the Update on Wikipedia page. I hope you understand my point.Thank you Swastik Mridha (talk) 15:14, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

If you find any problem regarding the way I had updated the article or If my way of Update made any policy violation. Your are always welcome to Implement the Wikipedia policy on my Change. Thank you Swastik Mridha (talk) 15:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)


 * I definitely understood your point. But source you read is not public which can be accessed by readers. Find a similar source online. I had found a source for you (maybe you were talking about this). For you to learn, go and replace/add source for you information where you made those edit. Happy editing. Brown Chocolate (talk) 17:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Okay, I will check out the article present online or not. If present online, I will definitely provide link for online readers to verify the information. Thank you Swastik Mridha (talk) 06:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

2020 China–India skirmishes
Hello, I saw you have been involving yourself heavily at the 2020 China–India skirmishes article. I just wanted to point out one thing that needs to be looked after. A number of editors are constantly inserting that ANI reported 43 KILLED Chinese soldiers. Which is not the case. ANI reported 43 killed AND seriously injured Chinese soldiers. But several editors are constantly removing the "injured" part and making it look like the figure represents only the dead. This represents a miss-interpretation of the cited source. I have already reached my limit of 3 reverts on the article in this regard so I can not do more due to the 3RR rule. But if you could watch out for this it would be great. Another newly-created account editor has already removed "injured" once again, as well as the 5 dead report by the GT, but at the moment I am not able to cancel him out. In any case, cheers and happy editing! EkoGraf (talk) 18:36, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

You see, I had also seen the article presented by ANI and I'm trying my best to keep the page as much neutral as possible but currently due to constant update many users are getting on their side and making the page lean on their side,so I won't do any edits right now as many users are still in warm mood so whatever neutral edits I do it would constantly get changed. So let the users have some time they will eventually cool down. Then, At that time I will publish the neutral report. :-) Swastik Mridha (talk) 18:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Yeah you are probably right. Wait a few days until everyone cools off. :) EkoGraf (talk) 18:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I have noticed that you have made several edits on this story. In future, please comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view guidelines while adding references which have to be verifiable. Also your tone has to be neutral. You cannot say "43 Chinese soldiers have died" based on Indian media sources alone. Look for other neutral sources such as BBC, Guardian, CNN, Telegraph (UK), Sydney Morning Herald, and European/Russian sources if you find any evidence. Even Chinese sources such as Global Times, Xinhua are unacceptable. You can use Indian sources for reconfirming stories that have already been confirmed by international media outlets. If this story had not involved India's position, you could have freely used the Indian media sources. That's what neutral point of view means. --Tech editor007 (talk) 09:59, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I never mentioned 43 Chinese Troops "Killed" when, Ever I had mentioned the 43 amount I had always mentioned " Death and Injured" as per the ANI news sources. And BBC can't be used for Indian matter at least. BBC continuously hold records for having anti-Indian coverage. And this fact is always not true, that being a Foreign news channel in any conflict means they will always have neutral coverage. And at the same time Wion news which is a Indian News holds record for having neutral coverage ( note I'm not advertising Wion news). So try to understand, and also when a figure is mentioned from any side media then the side is always mentioned. And also when I always mentioned any figure and sources I always use Media biased scale to see the coverage is whether left, Right or center lean :-) Swastik Mridha (talk) 13:51, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * First of all, please create an indentation like this while responding to any comments. That way it is easier to read for both you and me. Wikipedia is a global knowledgebase which belongs to people of all nations in the world. So it is not in Wikipedia's interest to take sides. The problem with Indian sources while mentioning Chinese casualties is that they may be biased against the Chinese. So you need neutral sources. BBC is not the only one: there are many others. For example, Straits Times (Singapore), SMH (Australia). You might have a point of view that BBC is biased against India for which you can create a new particle. This is not the place to discuss that. BBC is among the leading and most reputed worldwide sources for Wikipedia editing. You cannot compare it with WION which is very less known. Please study the reliable sources example at this link to understand which sources are considered reliable for Wikipedia, and which aren't. By all considerations, WION enjoys much less reputation here compared to BBC. Anyway, the edits I proposed have stayed because of the reasons mentioned. Please note that many non-Indians also refer Wikipedia for their knowledge consumption. So as a Wikipedia editor, it is our collective responsibility to stay impartial and unbiased. We cannot and should not take sides of even the country of our origin while editing the articles. --Tech editor007 (talk) 16:03, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hi, please provide at least a one-line WP:EDITSUMMARY, if not a detailed one for more controversial pages such as 2020 China–India skirmishes. Best regards, SerChevalerie (talk) 16:23, 4 July 2020 (UTC)


 * For which edit? Swastik Mridha (talk) 18:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Indian Railways. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox.    Debit pixie 💬 17:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Girth Summit. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lenovo, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Girth Summit  (blether) 14:58, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Richard Benjamin Harrison
Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with these edits to Richard Benjamin Harrison, as this violates Wikipedia's Verifiability policy. While I appreciate your addition of the military person template to the Infobox, and have kept that information, the year of Harrison second discharge is not indicated in any of the sources in the article to be 1979 (a passage in the article body gives it as 1976), and his entry into the service isn't mentioned at all. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 20:05, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   11:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Indian Army Digital Camouflage
The new Indian army digital camouflage is related to a previous US army camouflage which was based on CADPAT. This has been cited in one of the references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayonpradhan (talk • contribs) 17:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm Kpddg. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Hilal-e-Pakistan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Kpddg  (talk  •  contribs)  01:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions reminder
Kautilya3 (talk) 16:08, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Vandalism, only warning
Please explain why you're removing massive amounts of sourced content with no discernable explanation? If you do so again, especially without an adequate reason why, I will request a block. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:05, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Not to mention, you're WP:3RR edit warring and have been for several days, do not make any more edits without discussing it. PRAXIDICAE💕  18:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

May 2023
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for egregious vandalism of a WP:BLP, as you did at George Soros. I was very tempted to block you indefinitely, but since you've been editing for several years without being blocked, you're getting one more chance. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 07:50, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Bhaduri Moshai
 * added a link pointing to Indian
 * Nirendranath Chakravarty
 * added a link pointing to Indian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Flag icons and images in section headings
Hi Swastik Mrindha. Please don't add flag icons or other images to section headings like you recently did with respect to article Unified Payments Interface because doing can create MOS:ACCESS problems for some Wikipedia readers, particularly those who need to use screen readers to read articles due to some sort of visual impairment. Please refer to MOS:HEAD and MOS:ACCIM for more details on this. In addition to possible access problems, there's also very little encyclopedic value to using such icons/images in heading since all they really do is link to the country in question, which is generally not needed per WP:OVERLINK. Links to the Wikipedia article about a particular country can either be added as a WP:HATNOTE at the top of the relevant section or as an inline link in the first sentence of the section if really necessary; moreover, images of a country's flag can be added right below the section heading as a regular file (again if really necessary). -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)