User talk:Swati Das 17

Speedy deletion nomination of Gloria goodwin raheja
Hello Swati Das 17,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gloria goodwin raheja for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:36, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Gloria Goodwin Raheja for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gloria Goodwin Raheja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gloria Goodwin Raheja until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 10:02, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi! I'm working on Gloria Goodwin Raheja. I think she's notable. If you have any other sources, please add them, though. If you have any questions, please let me know, I'd be happy to help you out. :) Thanks! Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)