User talk:SweetGirlLove

Editing as compared to editing tendentiously
If you have no support for your edits its best you take a step back as it appears you are starting to edit war on the Zeitgeist movement and movie articles. The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, go to the talk page to discuss them. Please supply full citations when adding information and its best to use notable reliable sources. Earl King Jr. (talk) 01:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I have created a subject on the talk page. I wait for the discussionSweetGirlLove (talk) 01:58, 12 October 2014 (UTC)


 * You are a single purpose account and my guess is that you have been blocked many times from editing Wikipedia. You showed up around the time the last groups of sockpuppets editing the article were blocked. Also you resumed your edit war on the Zeitgeist material. You very well can be blocked from editing if you continue edit warring. Earl King Jr. (talk) 07:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Zeitgeist (film series) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Zeitgeist (film series) was changed by SweetGirlLove (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856053 on 2014-12-07T06:26:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:26, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Zeitgeist followers vandalizing articles. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 06:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Zeitgeist (film series). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Philg88 ♦talk 10:25, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
We assume good faith as far as possible, but letting the user off with a 3RR warning after assisting JamesB17, now indeffed, to revert war this edit into the Zeitgeist (film series) article, apart from other long-time disruption, seems impossible to me. You have been blocked indefinitely as not here to create an encyclopedia with likely sock/meatpuppet issues. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen &#124; talk 15:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC).