User talk:Sweetoms

(removed - see WP:SOAPBOX)

IM Speaking Out
sweetoms is not from this planet... nadia is phoning home... please lacate my ride to pick me up please...hurry this planet is abusing me for 3 years...please time is running out

'''will not remove any web pages from the internet nor do I have any access to a intronet... I will let the people that run and do there jobs Take care of this issue if there is one... If I have a issues with a web site comment I will try to -mail about the issue.Further more I would like wiki or any other imatain web sits using the wiki lingo.. That I Nadia S. Badilla have not donated any fund or time into needing a citsin comment other then one and it was in a different langue and I dont even know what it was about. I think I was testing on how to use the real wiki to my knowledge...'''

Intellectual property
I understand that I may be what is called "Intellectual property" at the begaining of my internet Matrix about the year of 2006.. I did go to the GOP website and found my name in the boolean and inventer from what  I can remember. when I refreshed it was gone or I got can not view page or some thing of that sorts..Pluss from the reading I read you had to pay for being a paitent... As you know I never new you had to pay for not asking to be paitent of "Intellectual property" thtas the short story.. [Federal Register: August 17, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 157)] [Notices] [Page 41431-41432] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr17au09-79]

---

OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[Docket No. EPA-HQ-ORD-2009-0331; FRL-8939-6]

Availability of Draft ``Planning Guidance for Recovery Following Biological Incidents''

AGENCIES: White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

---

SUMMARY: The Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-296 Section 301) directs the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in partnership with other federal agencies, to develop and implement countermeasures to prepare for and respond to chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear threats. The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are issuing a draft guidance document entitled ``Planning Guidance for Recovery Following Biological Incidents'' for federal, state, local, and tribal decision makers who may find it useful in planning and responding to a biological incident. This draft Guidance describes a general risk management framework for government and nongovernmental decision-makers, at all levels, in planning and executing activities required for response and recovery from a biological incident in a domestic, civilian setting. The objective of this guidance is to provide federal, state, local, and tribal decision makers with uniform federal guidance to protect the public, emergency responders, and surrounding environments and to ensure that local and federal first responders can prepare for an incident involving biological contamination. This draft Guidance is not intended to impact site cleanups occurring under other statutory authorities such as EPA's Superfund Program, or other federal and state clean-up programs. This draft guidance is provided for immediate use, and will be revised as needed based on comments received and changes in regulation and emergency response guidance. The draft guidance is available at: http://www.regulations.gov. (Docket no. EPA-HQ-ORD-2009-0331). Found - 820R08001

DATES: Comments must be received by November 16, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brendan Doyle, Senior Policy Advisor, National Homeland Security Research Center, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (MC: 8801R), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, Telephone: 202 564-4584 or doyle.brendan@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-296, as amended) directs DHS, in partnership with other federal agencies, to develop and implement countermeasures to prepare for and respond to chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear threats. Homeland Security Presidential Directive--10: Biodefense for the 21st Century describes the interagency activity required to meet this charge. This draft Planning Guidance was developed by the Biological Decontamination Standards Working Group (an interagency working group) of the White House National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) Subcommittee on Decontamination Standards and Technology (SDST). The SDST was tasked by the NSTC to develop risk management guidance for recovery from an incident involving biological contamination in a domestic, civilian setting. The interagency workgroup included participants from the Departments of Homeland Security, Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, Labor, Health and Human Services and Transportation and the Environmental Protection Agency. This draft guidance describes a general risk management framework for government

Page 41432

and nongovernmental decision-makers, at all levels, in planning and executing activities required for response and recovery from a biological incident in a domestic, civilian setting. The objective of this guidance is to provide federal, state, local, and tribal decision makers with uniform federal guidance to protect the public, emergency responders, and surrounding environments and to ensure that local and federal first responders can prepare for an incident involving biological contamination. This document follows principles developed within the context of Planning Guidance for Protection and Recovery Following Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) and Improvised Nuclear Device (IND) Incidents-- which was published by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on August 1, 2008. The RDD/IND document introduced the overarching concept of optimization. Optimization is a flexible, multi-attribute decision process that seeks to weigh many factors. Optimization analyses are qualitative and quantitative assessments applied at each stage of decision-making process from evaluation of decontamination options to implementation of the chosen alternative. The subject draft guidance applies to characterization, decontamination, clearance, and potential reoccupancy of a variety of public facilities, drinking water infrastructure, and open areas. Principal topics include the unique characteristics and hazards of biological agents, a risk management framework for responding to a biological incident, and implications for remediation activities. A process is provided for making timely and effective decisions despite incomplete data and uncertainties associated with potential risks posed by biological agents. This decision process includes all actions required during response to a biological incident beginning with notification, screening, and environmental sampling. Each step in the decision-making process is described, and the various actions are explicitly linked to numbered boxes in a five-page decision-tree flowchart. An important step in the decision process is setting clearance (or cleanup) goals for determining whether a remediation is successful and how the treated area may be used. No formula is available for setting clearance goals for biological agents. The collective, professional judgment of experts, considered within the context of the concerns of a broad range of local, regional, and federal stakeholders should be used to set a clearance goal appropriate to the site-specific circumstances. A practical clearance goal is to reduce residual risk to levels acceptable by employing an optimization process. The aim of such a process is to reduce exposure levels as low as is reasonable while considering potential future land uses, technical feasibility, costs and cost effectiveness, and public acceptability. After the remediation is carried out, a clearance decision is made based on a judgment whether the decontamination verification criteria and the clearance goals have been met. This judgment is based on a thorough analysis of all sampling, processes, and other pertinent data. This draft document focuses on the decision making framework in response to a biological event. It is designed to be consistent with the National Response Framework (Department of Homeland Security, January 2008) and our scientific understanding of the characteristics of biological agents. Neither of these areas is static. We expect both our response planning and our scientific understanding of the characteristics of biological agents to evolve over time.

Response to Comments

Comments will be reviewed by the White House National Science and Technology Council before this guidance is republished.

Availability of the Draft Guidance

Copies of the draft guidance are available for review through http://www.regulations.gov, Docket number: EPA-HQ-ORD-2009-0331.

Dated: July 27, 2009. James Kohlenberger, Chief of Staff, Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President. Bradley I. Buswell, Undersecretary for Science and Technology (Acting), U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Lek G. Kadeli, Acting Assistant Administrator for Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. [FR Doc. E9-19688 Filed 8-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

A kitten for you!
Re-search I need help...I miss little guy the bad aliens stoled him and skined him alive from what I heard.

Sweetoms 04:28, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 

New and Old Research
I don't no who's good and bad research! But let me say this I will find the bad! I'm needing the re-search team knows about my body going through changes from this wicked world.I'm homeless and carless because of this one man named wolf nasa and but chair man.